Article Type : Research Article
Authors : Varghese A, Loganathan K, Vaithilingam B, Varghese T and Pradeep P
Keywords : Third molar impaction, Awareness, Surgical intervention
Aim
and Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate the general
awareness about impacted third molars requiring surgical intervention and to
assess the level of self-motivation towards acceptance of minor surgical
intervention for removal of impacted 3rd molars.
Study
design: A random questionnaire-based study was carried out on 100 outpatients
who visited Penang International Dental College (PIDC). All the patients were
above 18 years of age and have not undergone either consultation or surgical removal
of impacted third molar.
Result:
A major segment (80%) of the respondents were aware of the presence of wisdom
teeth. But most of them (70%) were unaware about when it erupts. However, many
(64%) of them were aware of the surgical intervention required for the removal
of impacted third molar. Both male and female subjects exhibited similar trends
but the frequency was higher in females due to the larger female composition in
the sample size. Chinese had the highest frequency in terms of population size
(52%). All ethnic groups showed similar trends in answering almost all the
questions. There was a difference in frequency of response between ethnic
groups for a few questions, indicating that there is significant difference in
terms of knowledge between the Chinese and other groups. However, since the
Chinese have the highest frequency in terms of population size in this study,
this result may not be representative. Most of the respondents (74%) were
unwilling for surgical extraction of a painless impacted tooth. When a scenario
with a painful impacted tooth was presented, 84% of them opted for surgical
extraction, with some of them opting for professional opinion or medicine
relief.
Conclusion:
This study highlights that often pain is the main driving factor for seeking
treatment instead of prophylactic surveillance. Patients may have different
ideas regarding the management of their impacted third molars, but this should
not affect the dentist’s stand on the standard operating procedure of managing
impacted third molars.
Keywords: Third molar impaction; Awareness; Surgical intervention
Third molars (M3s) are the most distal teeth that
develop in each quadrant of the dental arch. They are the large grinding teeth
of the oral cavity and are the last to erupt. It is the only tooth developing
after the age of 14 years [1].The duration of formation and calcification,
crown and root morphology, its course of eruption and final position, presence
and absence in the oral cavity are the factors that contribute to the
characteristic variations of the third molar [2]. Impaction derived from the Latin
origin - impactus, means the cessation of eruption of a tooth caused by
physical barrier or ectopic positioning of tooth [3]. Quoted that impacted
refers to any tooth that is totally immersed in tissue and has already passed
its right time for eruption [4]. The impaction rate is higher for third molars
than for any other tooth in modern population, with possible explanation such
as inadequate retro molar space due to limited remodelling resorption, lack of
compensatory periosteal apposition at the posterior outline of the maxillary
tuberosity, and altered direction of tooth eruption during the functional phase
of eruption. Several studies show evidence that mandibular third molars are the
most common impacted teeth in various parts of the world [5,6]. The development
of the third molar and their interaction with the rest of the dentition has
been a major concern in dentistry for decades. According to Impacted M3s are
often associated with pericoronitis, dental caries, and resorption of the roots
of the adjacent tooth and rarely cyst formation and tumours [7]. In their
systematic review, that a cohort study reports of a surprisingly high
percentage (25%) of people with asymptomatic wisdom teeth having periodontal
disease, as evidenced by probing depths greater than 5 mm [8]. To relieve these
symptoms, surgical removal of impacted third molars has become one of the
commonest procedures in Malaysia. The guidelines for third molar extraction
provided by National Institute for Health Care and Excellence (NICE) was
reviewed in 2015 and further amendments were recommended9. The American
Associations of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons10 states that the decision and
rationale regarding third molar treatment is extremely complex, and the risk of
complications of early treatment of third molars must not be ignored. They
recommended active surveillance and annual review of unerupted wisdom teeth
with bone impaction, both clinically and radiographically. The incidence of
tooth impactions especially third molars is on the increase and is a major
cause of concern of dental professionals who mostly handle these cases in their
later stages when complications may arise. These complications may include
dental abscesses, tumours or systemic spread of infections arising from impacted
teeth. If this condition was to be detected early, patients would seek early
intervention thus avoiding the chances of developing complications. However,
the decision regarding the why, when and how to treat third molar teeth is
extremely complex, with complications that must not be ignored. As a matter of
fact, there are often insufficient evidence to support or refute prophylactic
removal of impacted wisdom teeth in adults, and instead active surveillance is
recommended as precaution. In the eyes of the public, such considerations may
not seem essential. Research focuses on subjects receiving public assistance in
Montreal. It shows that many patients do not consider oral health as a priority
and consequently neglect themselves. Furthermore, despite of their high
treatment needs, they do not consult a dentist often and this tends to
interrupt their episodes of care. Thus, this study is aimed to evaluate the
general awareness about impacted third molars. The primary focus will be the
patient’s education level on impacted third molars in terms of basic knowledge
of the tooth, implication of the impacted third molars and awareness about the
procedures involved in third molar removal [9-14].
Null
hypothesis is preferred in this study. The hypothesis of the study is as
follows:
H1: The general awareness about impacted third molars requiring surgical intervention is inadequate in the population.
H2: The level of self-motivation towards acceptance of minor surgical intervention for removal of impacted 3rd molars is inadequate among the population.
Aim
To
assess the general awareness and knowledge on impacted third molars.
Objectives
To
evaluate the general awareness about impacted third molars requiring surgical
intervention.
To assess the level of self-motivation towards
acceptance of minor surgical intervention for removal of impacted 3rd molars.
The primary focus will be the patient’s knowledge
level on impacted third molar, and their level of self-motivation towards
acceptance of minor surgical intervention for removal of impacted 3rd molars.
This research is a random study, and it employs quantitative analysis.
Quantitative data obtained from this study is used for statistical and
numerical analysis. The study will be carried out on patients visiting PIDC who
have not undergone consultation or surgical removal of impacted third molar. A
minimum sample size of hundred patients will be selected. No sample size
calculation was done.
Inclusion
criteria
Patients above 18 years of age, Patients who are
willing to answer the questionnaire
Exclusion
criteria
Patients who have undergone either consultation
for/surgical removal of impacted third molar, Patients not willing to answer
questionnaire.
The data analysis process involves applying the
reasoning method for understanding and interpreting the data collected by the
researcher. The collected data from 100 questionnaires were all used as it
contained all the important information to fulfil the objectives. Prior to the
study, significance level p = 0.05 and confidence level 95 % were used to
ensure that the results were reliable. Before applying statistical techniques,
all available data were tabulated to facilitate interpreting process. The
primary collected data was converted into user-friendly format by coding
method. Using Microsoft Excel, the coding is done in the spreadsheet. All data
was transferred from the questionnaire to the spreadsheet. All 100 respondents
against relevant question were entered and arranged in rows and columns.
Descriptive statistics used in this study include mode, mean and frequency
percentage. Data analysis and interpretation process was carried out thoroughly
and significant results were determined by the researcher. The results were
validated and justified.
Figure 1 represents the results of the response frequencies to determine the distribution of data based on gender. Result indicated that most of the respondents are female (58%) compare to male (42%) (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Demographic details of the study population according to gender (n=100).
Figure 2: Demographic
details of the study population according to ethnicity (n=100).
Figure 3: Demographic details of the study population according to nationality.
Figure 4: Question-1- Awareness of presence of wisdom teeth.
Figure 5: Question-2- Public knowledge on eruption age of wisdom teeth.
Figure 6: Question-3 - Public knowledge regarding eruption
failure of third molar in normal position.
Figure 7: Question-4 - Awareness regarding future problems associated with unerupted wisdom teeth.
Figure 8: Question-5 - Public awareness about wisdom teeth removal requiring minor oral surgery.
Figure 9: Question-6 - Public response on removal of painless impacted wisdom teeth.
Figure 10: Question-7 - Public response on removal of painful impacted wisdom teeth.
Figure 2 represents the results of the response
frequencies to determine the distribution of data based on ethnicity. Result
indicated that most of the respondents are Chinese (52%) followed by Indian
(25%), Malay (18%) and others (5%) (Figure 2).
Figure 3 represents the results of the response
frequencies to determine the distribution of data among Malaysians and
non-Malaysians. The result showed that most respondents are Malaysian (96%)
compare to non-Malaysian (4%) (Figure 3).
Figure 4 represents the results of the response
frequencies by gender to determine the public awareness of the presence of
wisdom teeth. The results indicated that most respondents are aware of the
presence of wisdom teeth (82%) (Figure 4).
Figure 5 represents the results of the response
frequencies by gender to assess the public knowledge on eruption age of wisdom
teeth. The results showed that majority of the respondents do not know the
eruption age of wisdom teeth (70%) (Figure 5).
Figure 6 represents the results of the response
frequencies by gender to assess the public knowledge that wisdom teeth will
more likely to fail to erupt in its normal position. The results showed nearly
an equal of positive response (51%) and negative response (49%) (Figure 6).
Figure 7 represents the results of the response
frequencies by gender to assess the public awareness that unerupted wisdom
teeth will most likely cause problems in the future. The results showed that
majority of the respondents showed positive response (56%) while 44 respondents
are not aware about the future complication of unerupted wisdom teeth (Figure
7).
Figure 8 represents the results of
the response frequencies by gender to assess the public awareness that removal
of unerupted wisdom teeth requires minor oral surgery. The results indicated
that majority of the respondents (64%) are aware that the procedure requires
minor oral surgery while 36 of them are not aware of it (Figure 8).
Question-7 - Public response on removal of painful
impacted wisdom teeth
Figure 9 represents the results of the response
frequencies by gender to assess the public response on removal of painful
impacted wisdom teeth through minor oral surgery. The results indicated that
majority of the respondents (84%) agree to remove painful impacted wisdom teeth
whereas 14 respondents refuse to remove them while 2 respondents showed
uncertainty to respond (Figure 9,10).
It is important to note that the general awareness of
the public towards management of third molars are barely satisfactory. It is
heartening to know that most (82%) of the respondents are aware of the presence
of wisdom teeth, but most of them (70%) are unaware about when it erupts. The
responses are evenly split when asked about the tendency of impaction of third
molars and their potential complications in the future. However, many of them
(64%) do know that impacted teeth do need minor oral surgical intervention.
When the data are compared in terms of gender, both male and female exhibit
similar trends but the frequency are higher in females, due to the larger
female composition in the sample size. In terms of ethnicity, the Chinese have
the highest frequency in terms of population size (52%). For all the questions,
all ethnic groups show similar trend in answering almost all the questions. In
terms of significant difference, there exist a difference in frequency of the
response between ethnic groups for Question 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, but the
difference was not significant (p>0.05). However, the p-value for Question 1
(P=0.026) and Question 7 (P=0.017) is lower than 0.05, which signifies that
there is significant difference in terms of these knowledge between the Chinese
and other groups. However, since the Chinese have the highest frequency in
terms of population size, this result may not be representative. When asked
about willingness to remove painless impacted third molars, most of the
respondents (74%) says no since the pain is absent. This finding corresponds to
the research by Bedoset al11 and statement by the AAOMS10, in which absence of
symptoms means absence of illness to them, which may conflict with a dentist’s
diagnosis. When a different scenario with painful impacted third molar is
presented to them, their focus shifted towards removal of the third molar to
remove pain (84%), with some of them opting for professional opinion or
medicine relief. Question 6 and 7 aims to assess the level of self-motivation
towards acceptance of minor surgical intervention for removal of impacted 3rd
molars. In this study, the presence or absence of pain is used as a parameter
to assess their motivation level. This is due to the fact that pain is one of
the main reasons for patients to seek dental treatment. According to Ekanayake
& Mendis14, dental pain is a significant predictor of the utilization of
dental services, in which 90% of the respondent in their survey who used dental
services are for symptomatic reasons. This study highlights the area in the
field of dentistry regarding third molar management which needed more
attention. More often, aesthetics of the teeth are given more attention. Survey
conducted by Dodd in Florida and Afroz supported this statement. On the other
hand, due to insufficient evidence to support or refute prophylactic removal of
impacted wisdom teeth in adults, active surveillance is recommended as
precaution. Pain is often the main driving factor for seeking treatment.
Despite the efforts, there are still limitations
to this study. The sample size was determined at 100, and the population is
unbalanced due to increased Chinese patients during the period of data
collection, in which the data may not represent the true population. Future
survey should include larger sample size with different data collection points
instead of only the dental clinic, to ensure that the sample truly represents
the population. The use of pain as an indication may be misleading, since the
perception of pain is different for each patient. Moreover, other symptoms
which may be associated with impacted third molars such as pericoronitis,
dental caries, trauma on occlusion is not included. These symptoms may have
different psychological effect on the patient, affecting their awareness to the
impacted third molars. The exclusion criteria may not be effective, since
patients may obtain information regarding impacted third molars from other
sources such as the Internet or from peers, without consulting the dentist.
Such information may affect their opinion regarding management of third molars,
resulting in multiple different reasons when answering Question 6 and 7.
In conclusion, the general awareness and knowledge on
impacted third molars is marginally satisfactory. The understanding about the
age of eruption, complications of impaction, minor oral surgery intervention
with its risk on removal of this tooth and its relation with pain still
requires improvement. The Ministry of Health of Oral Division and Malaysian
Dental Authorities should spare more effort to educate the public on awareness
and understanding of wisdom teeth and its management. In recent years, there is
an overall consensus that prophylactic removal of impacted third molar is done
only when future morbidity is anticipated and when patient indicated for
surgical removal of impaction is at low risk to develop surgical complications.
It is imperative that the Oral health authorities should ensure greater
implementation of health educational programs and alternative tools to improve
their awareness and knowledge about impaction. Any false statement about
impaction should be removed to prevent any confusion and it is hoped that this
study has generated some useful baseline information that would be helpful in
providing more educational approach on impaction in future.