Article Type : Research Article
Authors : Shahid R, Umar M, Khokhar MN, Sahar F and Aziz A
Keywords : Diagnostic; Therapeutic; Endoscopies; Surgeries; Laboratory tests; Ultrasounds
Objectives: To compare the provision of investigative and curative healthcare services of Benazir Bhutto Hospital Rawalpindi during 2018-2020. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional hospital record based comparative study was done to compare and analyze the frequency of diagnostic and therapeutic healthcare facilities utilized for healthcare of the general public who visited Benazir Bhutto Hospital (BBH) during interval of 2018-2020. Data was collected from administrators of BBH through informed consent. The diagnostic data was gathered regarding the magnitude of X-rays, ultrasounds, laboratory tests, ECGs, echocardiography’s and endoscopies. The therapeutic data was collected about the number of babies delivered, surgeries, physiotherapy and dialysis. The data was analysed by Microsoft Excel 2010 software. Results: About 11,98,288 laboratory tests were done during 2019 that constituted the highest frequency than those conducted during 2018 and 2020. Likewise 1,70,185 X-rays and 79,291 ultrasonography’s carried out during 2019 comprised the greatest magnitude of diagnsotics as compared to those of 2018 and 2020. Most (1760) endoscopies and 4947 echocardiographies were reported during 2018 and 2019 respectively. Most of the major and minor surgeries in addition to newborn deliveries and dialysis were also registered during 2019. Conclusion: Benazir Bhutto Hospital being a tertiary healthcare facility of Rawalpindi city is catering the greatest catchment area population.
The provision of high
standard and cost-effective healthcare across the globe has become quite
arduous. Numerous studies have been carried out to analyse the health system
with an intention to assess the availability, accessibility, acceptability and
affordability of healthcare services by the public [1]. Apart from scrutinizing
the quality of healthcare from viewpoint of patients’ convenience and
improvement of healthcare indicators, healthcare services delivery by any
healthcare facility in terms of adequacy of diagnostic and curative amenities
is of paramount significance [2]. The rationale behind planning health services
research is to improve the healthcare delivery in the community [3].
Performance of health system in terms of enhanced healthcare facilities and
improvement of healthcare indicators can aptly be assessed by its evaluation1.
Healthy people 2020 is versioned to provide high quality healthcare to the
population, to improve longevity and to get rid of preventable diseases, injury
and disabilities [4]. Healthcare delivery system of any region is meant to
ensure the fulfilment of healthcare needs of the community by involving the
concerned personnel and utilizing the available logistics and capitals [5].
Adequate functioning of healthcare systems is profoundly necessitated for
accomplishment of universal healthcare coverage [6]. Pakistan was known for
lack of Health Management Information System (HMIS) in public sector healthcare
settings for record maintenance a few decades ago [7]. Effectiveness and
efficiency of healthcare system primarily in developing countries like Pakistan
also need to be addressed in the goodwill of its populates [8]. Input of our
healthcare professionals and policy makers apart from feedback of the end users
can facilitate a great deal towards progression of current distressing scenario
[9]. Great initiatives were taken for up gradation of healthcare services,
installation of HMIS and expansion of teaching hospitals affiliated with
Rawalpindi Medical University from 2013 to ensure provision of
multidisciplinary healthcare to the common people of the society under one roof
[10]. One of the prime objectives of health services research is to inform
policy makers about the existing situation that in turn provoke them to take necessary
initiatives [11]. The present study is therefore intended to compare the
delivery of diagnostic and curative healthcare services to the public of
Rawalpindi district during 3 years duration (2018-2020). The results of this
survey would facilitate our strategic planners in perceiving the magnitude of
patient load in public sector tertiary healthcare facilities and hence would
enable them to take essential steps for appropriate management of cases.
Materials and Methods
A cross-sectional
hospital data based comparative study was done to compare and analyze the
proportion of diagnostic and therapeutic healthcare services provided for
well-being of the general public who visited Benazir Bhutto Hospital (BBH)
during 2018-2020. Data was collected from hospital administrators after getting
informed consent. The diagnostic data was gathered regarding the number of
X-rays, ultrasounds, pathological tests, ECGs, echocardiographies and
endoscopies. The curative data was collected about the number newborns
delivered, both major and minor surgical procedures, physiotherapy and
dialysis. The data analysis was done by means of Microsoft Excel 2010 software.
Results
The frequency of diverse
radiological and pathological tests done from 2018-2020 at BBH were compared as
depicted (Figure 1,2).
About 4813, 4947 and 2505
ECGs were done at BBH during 2018, 2019 and 2020 respectively. Only 751
endoscopies and 2505 echo-cardiographies were done for diagnosis during 2020
that was comparatively less in propensity as illustrated (Figure 3-5).
Being a tertiary care hospital and having affiliation with Rawalpindi Medical University facilities for physiotherapy and dialysis of the needy people were also available at BBH. The propensity of the approximation of our population to these approaches is revealed (Figure 6).
Discussion
Access to quality
healthcare services by all people and communities of any region is one of the
means to ensure achievement of universal health coverage and also a hope
towards accomplishment of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Promoting
Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) and placement of adequate infrastructure for
confirmatory diagnosis and swift cure of the public is imperative to improve
healthcare indicators of a country [12]. Although our people in government
hospitals are receiving healthcare without facing financial catastrophe, but
attaining the optimum standard of healthcare is the fundamental right of every
citizen.
In current study,
laboratory testing facilities in addition to radiological services were
analysed during 3 years tenure (2018-2020). This study was basically meant to
assess the magnitude of healthcare problems catered through provision of
sufficient diagnostic opportunities to the common people and henceforth their
facilitation towards securing pertinent healthcare. Radiological and pathological
services constitute the core of healthcare amenities available at any tertiary
care facility [13]. Surgical and allied, medical and allied, obstetrical,
aesthetic and above all ophthalmological departments cannot make any suggest
any operation or procedure without procuring the complete biochemical profile
and radiographic reports of any patient. In our study, laboratory testing,
X-rays and ultrasonographies were found to be relatively in greater magnitude
during 2018 and 2019 than those carried out in 2020. This difference might be
the lockdown imposition during April 2020 as a result of COVID pandemic and
shut down some of the departments and conversion of Benazir Bhutto Hospital
(BBH) and Rawalpindi Institute of Urology and Transplantation (RIUT) as COVID
Hospital in response to government notification and specification of 50 beds of
these hospital for isolation of coronavirus infected cases from Rawalpindi
district [14]. Being equipped with all essential diagnostic and curative
amenities, maximum populates of Rawalpindi district and those from the vicinity
preferably visit BBH for their healthcare problems. Moreover, this hospital is
not only recognized for postgraduate training of doctors and nurses but also
designated to provide consultancy to the inhabitants of about 27 EMRO countries
[15]. Some of the underprivileged states of Mexico and Brazil were confronted
with difficulties in timely provision of surgical, obstetric and anesthetic
facilities to their population due to insufficient investigative services at
their hospitals. Even the manpower for execution of diagnostics in healthcare
facilities of these poor states was quite meagre [16]. Acquisition with
advanced investigative and therapeutic services of any institute enable the
utilization of those facilities for the wellbeing of humanity. In addition to
diagnostic, various therapeutic and restorative measures have also been carried
out to make the healthcare services satisfactory for the population of the
respective catchment area. Apart from birth of newborn babies, incidence of
major and minor surgeries, physiotherapies and dialysis of the patients
accomplished at BBH during 2018-2020 were also analyzed to judge the workload.
However the curative services were made available to the patients comparatively
more during 2019 as evident. A similar cross-sectional study done by Roa et al
to compare the availability of surgeons in public and private sector healthcare
settings revealed that despite the easy access to public sector hospitals by majority
of the Mexican populates, private sector healthcare facilities were determined
to be fully equipped with all necessary adult and pediatric equipment; however,
anaesthetists, surgeons and obstetricians were relatively all time available in
public hospitals than those of private clinics [17]. Being situated in the
center of Rawalpindi city, the services of BBH are quite conveniently
accessible to the common citizens. Periodic Feedback of the patients pertinent
to consultation with doctors and procurement of healthcare and free medication
in public sector healthcare facilities is of utmost importance to enhance
healthcare indicators of the country [18]. Maneuvering the healthcare in the
light of patients’ feedback and suggestions can help our administrators to
great extent in improving the standard of care by capacity building of the
healthcare professionals including support staff and implementation of relevant
Minimum Service Delivery Standards (MSDS).
Conclusion and Recommendations
Benazir Bhutto Hospital
being situated in the center of Rawalpindi is housed with all essential
clinical requisites to manage healthcare issues of the community. Training of
the healthcare workforce and improving the services in accordance with feedback
of the patients can help a great deal to enhance the quality of healthcare.
1.
Steinwachs
DM, Hughes RG. Patient safety and quality: An Evidence-based handbook for
nurses. Health Services Research: Scope and Significance. Agency healthcare Res
Quality. 2008.
2.
Lohr
KN, Steinwachs DM. Health services research: an evolving definition of the
field. Health Serv Res. 2002; 37: 7-9.
4.
Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention. Healthy People. 2020.
5.
Mills
A. Health care systems in low-and middle-income countries. N Engl J Med. 2014;
370: 552-557.
6.
World
Health Organization. Universal health coverage.
7.
Nishtar
S. The Gateway Paper: Health Systems in Pakistan, a Way Forward. Pakistan's
Health Policy Forum. 2006.
9.
Institute
of Medicine (US), Committee on Quality of Healthcare in America. Crossing the
quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington (DC):
National Academies Press. 2001.
10.
Rawalpindi
Medical University. Development Report 2013-2016: Excellence in patient care
and medical education.
11.
Dewey
A, Drahota A, Fogg C, Brown SH, Kilburn S, Mackenzie H, et al. Conducting
health services research. SSMJ. 2011.
12.
World
Health Organization and OECD and World Bank. Delivering quality health
services: A global imperative for universal health coverage. 2018.
14.
List
of Hospitals province-wise with isolation facilities.
15.
Benazir
Bhutto Hospital.
17.
Roa
L, Moeller E, Fowler Z, Carrillo F, Mohar S, Williams W, et al. Assessment of
surgical capacity in Chiapas, Mexico: A cross-sectional study of the public and
private sector. BMJ Open. 2021; 11: 044160.
18.
Doyle
C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between
patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open. 2013; 3:
1-18.