Article Type : Research Article
Authors : Prajapati BG and Mishra O
Keywords : Tablets
Effervescent
tablets are easy to consume due to this they are getting popular over other
oral dosage forms. Effervescent tablets get break when they are put in water or
juice which causes tablet to dissolve and form a solution. USFDA redefined the
definition to Effervescent tablet is a tablet intended to be dissolved or
dispersed in water before administration. Effervescent tablets consists of
acids/acid salt, carbonates and hydrogen carbonates, flavour, sweetener, etc.
which release carbon dioxide when it is added to water
Effervescent tablets
are easy to consume due to this they are getting popular over other oral dosage
forms. Effervescent tablets get break when they are put in water or juice which
causes tablet to dissolve and form a solution. USFDA redefined the definition
to Effervescent tablet is a tablet intended to be dissolved or dispersed in
water before administration. Effervescent tablets consists of acids/acid salt,
carbonates and hydrogen carbonates, flavour, sweetener, etc. which release
carbon dioxide when it is added to water. Following chemical reaction takes
place in effervescent tablets [1].
C6H8O7
(aq) + 3NaHCO3 (aq) ? Na3C6H5O7
(aq) + 4H2O + 3CO2 (g) ?
Citric acid + Sodium bicarbonate ? Sodium citrate +
Water + Carbon dioxide
The above reaction occurs due to presence of water, because water is one of the reaction product which accelerates the reaction, leading to difficulty in stopping the reaction. Due to this reason manufacturing and storage of effervescent product is planned by minimizing their contact with water [2,3].
·
Administered as palatable
sparkling solution
·
Readily absorbed because
it has to consume in solution form.
·
No need to swallow tablet
·
Drugs that are unstable
in aqueous solution when stored shows more stable state in effervescent
granules or tablets forms.
·
Better/good intestinal
and stomach tolerance
·
Large amount of active
ingredients can be easily incorporated
·
Better or accurate
dosing.
· Rapid onset of action Good in taste.
· Excipients
are costly
· Special
production facilities is required.
· High sodium or potassium makes it inappropriate for patients with heart failure or cardiac insufficiency Difficult to formulate drugs with unpleasant taste sufficiently palatable as an effervescent product [4-7].
Excipients used in
effervescent formulation is mentioned below [8]:
Acids
·
Citric acid
·
Tartaric acid
·
Adipic acid
·
Fumaric acid
·
Malic acid
Carbonates/Bicarbonates
·
Sodium carbonate
·
Potassium carbonate
·
Calcium carbonate
·
Sodium bicarbonate
·
Potassium bicarbonate
Lubricants
·
Sodium benzoate
·
Polyethylene glycol
·
Adipic acid
·
Magnesium stearate
Inders
·
Lactose
·
Sorbitol
·
Xylitol
·
Dextrose
Sweeteners
·
Acesulfame potassium
·
Sodium saccharin
·
Aspartame
·
Sucralose
Flavours
·
Powdarome Lemon
·
Powdarome Orange
·
Strawberry Flavour
·
Tutti Frutti Flavo
Figure 1: Wet Granulation process for effervescent tablets
Wet
Granulation [9-21]
Wet
granulation is most common granulating process among other granulation method.
In this method material is wetted by addition of binder solution and then
drying is performed to get dry granules.
Wet
granulation process involves following steps:
·
Dry mixing of drug and
excipients
·
Addition of binder
solution to form a wet mass
·
Drying of wet mass to get
the dried granules
·
Blending with extra
granular material and with lubricants
·
Blend or granules are now
ready for compression
Wet
Granulation through fluid bed Process
Fluid
bed granulation can also be used for effervescent tablets. In this method
material is added into it and the binder solution is sprayed on that material,
simultaneously hot air is blown from the bottom to make the granules dry.
Thought requires high amount of granulation fluid which makes the process time
higher and also makes it expensive.
Wet
Granulation through fusion method
In
this method acid and base (alkali) is mixed which is then heated due to which
water is released from it. This released water of crystallization will act as a
granulating agent so there is no need of addition of external water as a
granulating agent. In this method chain reaction can occur which can produce
excess moisture, so it is necessary to terminate this chain reaction. In rare
cases, lower carbon dioxide content is observed in effervescent composition if
it is produced by this method. Lower mechanical strength of product (tablets)
is observed which the disadvantage of this method is.
Steam granulation: Steam granulation process do not require water, it utilizes steam instead of liquid water as a granulating agent. Steam provides higher diffusion rate into powder due to which it forms a hot thin film of water on the powder particles, requires small amount of heat to make it evaporate and thus dry granules are obtained [21-24] (Figure 2).
TOPO granulation: TOPO
vacuum granulation is a patented technology for the moisture sensitive
component like effervescent dosage forms. In this technology, a small amount of
water is added during process. Due to the chain reaction initiated by reaction
between acid and base, additional water is generated which has to be eliminated
by applying vacuum repeatedly for some time during the process. Due
to vacuum, material is allowed to dry at low temperature; also less drying time
is required. This makes the process more beneficial for the components or API
that are heat sensitive so it is a cost effective production process.
Continuous flow: Continuous
flow technology is an advanced step of TOPO granulation which is designed for
the continuous manufacturing of effervescent products. With the help of this
technology manufacturers can produce up to 10 tons of granules every day. In
this process powder is fed from one end and granules are collected from the
other end and the entire process is carried out in an inclined drum. This
technology is more useful when large amount of product is required to
manufacture, especially sensitive materials or API like calcium or vitamin D3
[25].
Dry
granulation: In dry granulation method the powder
mixture is compressed without heating as there is no use of solvent. It is the
least desirable method among various granulation method. The two basic
procedures are to form a compact of material by compression and then to mill
the compacted material to obtain a granules. Two methods are commonly used for
dry granulation. The more widely used method is slugging, where the powder is
recompressed and the resulting tablet or slug are milled to get the granules.
Another method is to recompress the powder with pressure rolls using a machine
such as Chilsonator.
Figure 3: Dry granulation process for effervescent tablets.
Figure 4: Melt granulation process for effervescent tablets.
Dry
granulation using roller compaction:
Materials are fed from the hopper which then goes to pressure rolls, this
pressure rolls will compact the material into flakes which is milled or cut to
obtain the granules. Similarly in slugging process materials are compressed in
tablet machine to tablets and then milled to obtain the granules [26-32].
Melt Granulation /
Thermoplastic Granulation: Melt granulation is similar to wet granulation
only the difference is of use in binder (moldable). In melt granulation, binder
which is in solid state is allowed to melt at temperature range of 50-80?. This
melted binder will now be used as a granulating liquid. As there is no need of
drying phase because as we cool it at room temperature dried granules are
obtained [33] (Figures 3,4).
Pre-compression
parameters
Angle
of repose (?): To measure angle of repose, powder
materials are allowed to flow from the funnel which is fixed with the stand at
definite height. The radius and height of heap of powder formed is measured.
Apart from flow property, Frictional force between powder and granules can be
measured with the help of it.
Where, ? is the angle of repose
H is height of pile
R is radius of the base of pile
Relation between angle of repose and flow property of powder
is shown in below table (Table 1).
Table 1: Type of flow of granules based on angle of repose.
Angle of repose
(degrees) |
Type of flow |
< 25 |
Excellent |
25-30 |
Good |
30-40 |
Moderate flow |
> 40 |
Poor |
Flow Rate: Flow rate is defined as rate at which material or powder emerges out from the orifice of funnel having suitable diameter. Weighed quantity of granules are allowed to poured into funnel having orifice of diameter 8mm and then flow rate is measured using stopwatch by noting the required by granules to emerge out from the orifice. Flow rate = weight of granules/ time in seconds Bulk density: Bulk density is obtained dividing weight of powder to bulk volume in cm3. Powder of about 50cm3 is taken and poured into the 100ml graduated cylinder and is allowed to dropped at 2 second interval for three times from a height of 1 inch onto a hard wooden surface. Bulk density is then calculated by using below equation. Where Db = bulk density M = weight of samples in grams Vf = final volumes of granules in cm3 in cylinder Tapped density: The tapped density can be obtained by dividing the mass of a powder by the tapped volume in cm3. The sample of about 50 cm3 of powder previously been passed through a standard sieve no. 20, has to carefully introduced into a 100 ml graduated cylinder. The cylinder has to drop at 2-second intervals onto a hard wood surface 100 times from a height of 1 inch. The tapped density of each formulation can then obtained by dividing the weight of sample in grams by the final tapped volume in cm3 of the sample present in the cylinder. Equation for tapped density is given below: Where Db= bulk density M = weight of samples in grams Vf= final volumes of granules in cm3 Carr’s Index: Carr’s Index also known as Carr’s compressibility index is an indirect method of measuring powder flow from bulk density was developed by Carr. The percentage compressibility of a powder is a direct measure of the potential powder arch or bridge strength and stability. Carr’s index of each formulation can be calculated according to equation given below: %Compressibility = D2 – D1/D2 ×100 Where, D2 = Poured bulk or bulk density. D1= Tapped or Consolidated bulk density (Table 2).
Table 2: Carr’s Index indicating flow of powder.
Carr’s index (%) |
Type of flow |
5-15 |
Excellent |
12-16 |
Good |
18-21 |
Fair |
23-28 |
Slightly Poor |
28-35 |
Poor |
35-38 |
Very Poor |
>40 |
Extremely poor |
Weight variation:
Twenty tablets from every batch is randomly selected to check their uniformity.
These tablets are weighed individually and their avg. weight is calculated.
From this average weight, percent deviation each tablet is obtained. Limit for
weight variation as per I.P and USP is mentioned below (Table 3).
Table 3: Weight variation
specification.
IP/BP |
Limit |
USP |
80 mg or less |
10% |
130mg or less |
More than 80mg or Less than 250mg |
7.5% |
130mg to 324mg |
250mg or more |
5% |
More than 324mg |
Tablet thickness and diameter:
Thickness and diameter of tablets are important for uniformity of tablet size.
It is measured using Vernier Callipers.
Tablet
hardness: Resistance of tablets is generally depend
on the hardness of tablets which is an important factor as tablet may get break
during transportation, storage and handling if it does not have proper
hardness. Monsanto hardness tester is used to measure the hardness of tablet.
Hardness is measured in kg or N.
Friability
(F): Friability of tablet is measured to know
the effect of shock or abrasion on tablets. To determine the friability of
tablet Roche Friabilator is used. In this device pre weighed tablets are placed
inside the friabiator and are allowed to rotate at 25 rpm for 4minutes, tablets
are dropped from height of 15.6 cm in each revolution. According to USP
friability limit should be within 0.5-1%.
Measurement
of effervescence time: To measure the
effervescence time, one tablet is placed inside the beaker containing 200 ml of
water having temperature 20 °C ± 1 °C, while placing the tablet in beaker time
should be noted in stopwatch. Final time is noted when the clear solution is obtained
or tablet is completely dispersed. About mean of 3 tablets should be measured
of each formulation.
Determination
of effervescent solution pH
pH of solution should be checked immediately after
completing the dissolution time of tablet using pH meter. Mean of 3
measurements is taken into consideration.
Measurement
of CO2 content
One tablet is placed in 100ml of 1N sulfuric acid and
weight changes are determined. The difference obtained is in amount of carbon
dioxide (mg) in one tablet. Measurement of 3 tablets is taken into
consideration.
Moisture
content
10 tablets are dried in desiccators which contain
activated silica gel and let it remain for 4 hours. Moisture content of 0.5% or
less is accepted for effervescent tablets.
Uniformity
of content
10 tablets are selected randomly. Each tablet has to
place into a 50mL volumetric flask, dissolved and diluted to 50 mL with
phosphate buffer pH 6.8. One ml of this solution is diluted to 100 ml with
phosphate buffer pH 6.8. The amount of drug present in each tablet can be
determined by UV spectroscopy at 246 nm. Standard limit for uniformity of
content is as follows;
· 10 tablets are randomly
selected and placed into 50ml volumetric flask, dissolve it in 50ml of
phosphate buffer having pH 6.8. One ml from this is taken and diluted with
100ml of phosphate buffer of pH 6.8. Amount of drug present in it can be
measured by UV spectroscopy at 246nm. Standard limit is shown as below:
IP:
Active less than 10mg or 10%,
BP:
Active less than 2 mg or 2%,
USP:
Active less than 25mg or 25%.
· 10 tabs limit not more
than (NMT) one tablet deviate from range 85 – 115% & no tablet is outside
75 – 125% of the Avg value of /IP/BP/USP (Relative Standard Deviation less than
or equal to 6%).
· If 2 or 3 tablets are
within range of 85-115% and none of the tablet is outside the range of 75-125%
repeat again with 20 tablets.
· The preparation complies
the test if NMT one tablet is outside 85-115% limit and no tablet is outside
the range of 75-125% of avg. content [34].
5. Ofoefule
SI. Textbook of pharmaceutical technology and industrial pharmacy.
Nigeria: Samakin Enterprise. 2002.
7. Lee
R, Amerilab. Effervescent tablets key facts about a unique. Effective dosage
form. 2004.
8. Abdul AS. Formulation, evaluation and mathematical modelling of clopidogrel
bisulphate aspirin immediate release bilayer tablets. Pharma Anal Acta. 2012;
3: 194.
9. Biswas D, Halquist M. Using bio relevant in vitro models testing to
characterize release of non oral dosage forms as another tool for safety. J
Pharmacovigilance. 2016; 4: 153-160.
10. Bhattacharjee
J. Mass drugs administration in India - A Failure Story. Epidemiol. 2016; 6:
252.
15. Patil JS. Hydrogel system: An approach for drug delivery modulation. Adv
Pharmacoepidemiology Drug Safety. 2015; 4:135.
16. Patil JS. Novel tubercular therapeutic agents: Need of the Day. Adv
Pharmacoepidemiology drug safety. 2015; 4: 137.
18. Teoh BC, Alrasheedy AA,
Hassali MA, Tew MM, Samsudin MA. Perceptions of doctors and pharmacists towards medication error reporting
and prevention in Kedah, Malaysia: A Rasch Model Analysis. Adv
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015; 4: 192.
19. Long AG, Williams LR. United States Pharmacopeia 31/National formulary
26. Rockville MD USA. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. 2008.
21. Sandhyarani G, Kumar KP. Formulation and evaluation of fast dissolving
Tablet of imidapril. Indian J Pharma Sci Res. 2017; 4: 147-150.
23. Steer engineering private limited. Effervescent composition and method of
making it. US Patent WO. 2016.
25. Larry
LA, Stephan WH. Pharmaceutical dosage form: Tablets 3rd edition. 2008; 1: 465.
28. Dhakar RC, Maurya SD, Dangi G, Kumar G , Gupta M, Kiroriwal S. Buccal
adhesive dosage forms As A NISDD: A Pharmaceutical Rev. Res Pharma. 2010; 1:
46-59.
34. Maurya SD, Tilak VK, Dhakar RC, Verma KK, Soni U, Gupta. Preparation and
evaluation of floating tablet of famotidine through solid dispersion. Inter J
Current Res Rev. 2011; 1: 21-30.