Article Type : Case Report
Authors : Kumar P, Sinha S and Coombe MG
Keywords : Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema; CPFE; Emphysema; Interstitial lung disease; DLCO; Pulmonary hypertension; Pulmonary nodules; Bronchiectasis
Background:
Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is a distinct
clinico-radiological syndrome defined by the co-presence of emphysema and
fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). It is clinically important because it
is frequently accompanied by disproportionate exertional hypoxemia, a high
burden of pulmonary hypertension, vulnerability to acute respiratory
deteriorations, and an increased risk of lung cancer.
Case
Presentation: We report a 79-year-old male ex-smoker with severe
smoking-related chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/emphysema and
bronchiectasis who presented with several days of worsening dyspnea, increased
cough, and increased sputum production. He was diagnosed with an infective COPD
exacerbation complicated by community-acquired pneumonia. A non-contrast
computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrated severe centrilobular and paraseptal
emphysema with basal-predominant subpleural reticular change, lingular
consolidation, and scattered micronodules. Comprehensive pulmonary function
testing showed severe airflow obstruction with marked hyperinflation and a
disproportionately severe reduction in gas transfer (diffusing capacity for
carbon monoxide [DLCO] 32.5% predicted). Transthoracic echocardiography
performed during admission demonstrated normal right ventricular size and
function with an estimated right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) of 28
mmHg, without evidence of significant pulmonary hypertension at that time.
Conclusion:
This case illustrates a classic CPFE phenotype, integrating characteristic CT
findings with the typical physiological signature of marked gas transfer
impairment despite spirometric obstruction. It highlights a practical approach
to identifying CPFE in patients labelled primarily as COPD, outlines a
structured differential diagnosis (including asbestos-related disease in the
appropriate exposure context), and supports a longitudinal management strategy
focused on optimizing oxygenation, preventing exacerbations, surveilling for
pulmonary hypertension, and maintaining vigilance for pulmonary malignancy.
Combined
pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) describes the coexistence of upper-lobe
predominant emphysema and lower-lobe predominant fibrotic interstitial lung
disease, most often seen in older individuals with a substantial cigarette
smoking history. CPFE may be under-recognised because conventional spirometry
can underestimate overall parenchymal disease severity; lung volumes may be
relatively preserved or even increased due to hyperinflation, while gas
exchange is often markedly impaired. A key clinical clue is a disproportionate
reduction in diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) relative to the
degree of airflow obstruction. Recognition matters because CPFE carries a
distinctive complication profile, particularly pulmonary hypertension and an
increased incidence of lung cancer, and therefore benefits from deliberate
diagnostic labelling and a structured follow-up approach that extends beyond
COPD management alone [1-3].
A
79-year-old man, an ex-smoker who ceased tobacco use approximately five years
prior to presentation, was admitted with a several-day history of progressive
worsening of baseline dyspnea, increased cough, and increased sputum
production. His medical history included severe physician-diagnosed
COPD/emphysema, bronchiectasis, hypertension, and hyperuricemia. He appeared
cachectic with a body mass index (BMI) of approximately 17 kg/m². His resting
oxygen saturation on room air was 94% at initial assessment. His
remote surgical history included pleurodesis at approximately 18 years of age
for recurrent pleural effusions of uncertain aetiology. Occupationally, he
reported substantial historical exposure to inorganic dusts, including coal
dust and asbestos. The clinical course is summarised
chronologically. The patient initially presented on 27 December 2025, at which
time venous blood gas sampling was performed. A non-contrast CT chest was
completed on 28 December 2025. He was transferred to a tertiary centre for
ongoing inpatient care on 29 December 2025. Further inpatient assessment
included full pulmonary function testing on 7 January 2026, and transthoracic
echocardiography with selected autoimmune serology on 8 January 2026. He
was treated for an acute infective exacerbation of COPD complicated by
community-acquired pneumonia. Examination findings documented in clinical notes
included bilateral basal inspiratory crackles (more prominent on the right) and
diffuse expiratory wheeze. The contemporaneous working diagnosis emphasised
severe COPD/emphysema, consistent with his established history.
Venous Blood Gas Analysis
A
venous blood gas sample obtained on room air (FiO? 0.21) showed pH 7.44, pCO?
44 mmHg, and pO? 41 mmHg, with bicarbonate 30 mmol/L, base excess +4.7 mmol/L,
and lactate 2.7 mmol/L. This profile was interpreted as compatible with acute
infective physiology and a metabolic component, without evidence of overt acute
hypercapnic respiratory failure at that time.
Computed Tomography of
the Chest
Non-contrast
CT imaging demonstrated severe centrilobular and paraseptal emphysema
throughout the upper and mid-lung zones. Basal-predominant subpleural reticular
change and fine reticulation were present, most evident within the left lower
lobe and lingula, consistent with fibrotic interstitial abnormality. Acute
infective change was represented by consolidation in the superior segment of
the lingula. A previously described nodular opacity had largely resolved;
however, a new ill-defined 6 mm nodular opacity was noted in the left upper
lobe/lingular region, with additional scattered micronodules. Bibasal pleural
thickening was described, without pleural effusion or pneumothorax. Mediastinal
lymph nodes were not enlarged by size criteria. Overall, the imaging pattern
supported a CPFE phenotype (coexistent emphysema and basal fibrotic change)
with superimposed infection.
Pulmonary Function
Testing
Full pulmonary function testing (Table 1) demonstrated severe airflow obstruction post-bronchodilator (FEV? 0.98 L, 43.5% predicted; FEV?/FVC 52%) with marked hyperinflation and air trapping (TLC 152.9% predicted; RV 264.1% predicted). Gas transfer was severely impaired (DLCO 32.5% predicted; KCO 37.7% predicted). The combination of obstruction, profound hyperinflation, and a disproportionately severe reduction in DLCO is physiologically consistent with CPFE.
Table 1: Comprehensive Pulmonary Function Test Results (07 January 2026).
|
Parameter |
Measured
Value |
Percent
of Predicted |
|
Spirometry (post-bronchodilator) |
||
|
FEV? |
0.98 L |
43.5% |
|
FVC |
1.89 L |
63.3% |
|
FEV?/FVC |
52% |
— |
|
Lung Volumes (Body Plethysmography) |
||
|
TLC |
8.65 L |
152.9% |
|
RV |
6.72 L |
264.1% |
|
RV/TLC |
77.6% |
— |
|
Diffusing Capacity (Single-Breath) |
||
|
DLCO |
6.64 mL/min/mmHg |
32.5% |
|
KCO |
— |
37.7% |
|
VA |
— |
87.5% |
Transthoracic
Echocardiography
Transthoracic
echocardiography was performed as screening for pulmonary hypertension. Left
ventricular systolic function was preserved (ejection fraction 57%). Right
ventricular size and systolic function were normal. Trace to mild valvular
regurgitation was present. Estimated RVSP was 28 mmHg, within the normal range
and not suggestive of significant pulmonary hypertension at the time of
testing, although imaging windows were described as technically difficult.
Serological
Investigations
Selected
serology was performed to evaluate for connective tissue disease-associated ILD
and other systemic drivers. Rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated
peptide antibodies were negative. Serum angiotensin-converting enzyme level was
within the reference range.
The
diagnosis of CPFE was made by integrating radiological and physiological
evidence within a compatible clinical phenotype. CT imaging demonstrated
emphysema (severe centrilobular and paraseptal change) together with basal
subpleural reticulation suggestive of fibrotic ILD. Pulmonary function testing
quantified severe airflow obstruction and hyperinflation attributable to
emphysema, alongside marked impairment in gas transfer consistent with
significant alveolar-capillary involvement from fibrotic parenchymal disease.
Clinically, the patient’s demographic profile (older male ex-smoker), cachexia,
and substantial dyspnea burden supported CPFE as the unifying chronic
diagnosis, with the acute admission reflecting an infective exacerbation and
pneumonia occurring on the background of this dual-pathology syndrome [1-3].
In patients with
emphysema plus basal interstitial abnormality, a deliberate differential
diagnosis helps avoid misclassification and supports appropriate surveillance
and prognostication.
Acute
Inpatient Management
Acute
management followed standard approaches for an infective COPD exacerbation with
community-acquired pneumonia. Treatment included intravenous antibiotics
directed at common respiratory pathogens, systemic corticosteroids for airway
inflammation, and frequent bronchodilator therapy. Because bronchiectasis was
present, airway clearance strategies and chest physiotherapy were emphasised.
Supportive measures included venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and careful
oxygen titration to maintain adequate oxygenation while monitoring for carbon
dioxide retention risk [9].
Longitudinal and
Multidimensional CPFE Management Plan
Recognition of CPFE should trigger a structured plan that addresses emphysema, fibrosis, bronchiectasis, and the syndrome’s major complications.
The patient improved clinically with inpatient therapy including antibiotics, systemic corticosteroids, bronchodilator optimisation, and airway clearance measures, and he was stabilised for discharge. The broader diagnostic work-up clarified the underlying CPFE syndrome. Post-discharge review in 4–6 weeks was recommended to reassess symptoms and oxygenation following recovery from acute infection. Pulmonary function testing, with attention to DLCO trajectory, should be repeated at least annually. A follow-up non-contrast CT chest in 3–6 months was recommended to document resolution of consolidation and to reassess pulmonary nodules within a structured protocol. Repeat echocardiography for pulmonary hypertension surveillance should be incorporated into ongoing care (Table 2).
Table 2: Summary of Key Findings on Non-Contrast CT Chest.
|
Region
/ Pattern |
Findings |
|
Emphysema |
Severe, confluent centrilobular
and paraseptal emphysema, predominantly in upper and middle lung zones. |
|
Interstitial / fibrotic change |
Basal-predominant, subpleural
reticular opacities and fine reticulation, most pronounced in the left lower
lobe and lingula. |
|
Consolidation (acute) |
Patchy consolidation in the
superior segment of the lingula consistent with pneumonia; a smaller focus of
ground-glass opacity/consolidation also described in the right upper lobe. |
|
Pulmonary nodules |
New 6 mm ill-defined,
non-calcified nodular opacity in the left upper lobe/lingular region;
additional scattered sub-centimetre micronodules. |
|
Pleura |
Symmetrical bibasal pleural
thickening; no pleural effusion or pneumothorax. |
|
Mediastinum / hila |
No lymph nodes >1 cm
short-axis; cardiac silhouette described as normal. |
This case highlights the clinical value of recognising CPFE when emphysema and fibrotic interstitial abnormality coexist. The severe DLCO reduction (32.5% predicted), occurring alongside pronounced hyperinflation and airflow obstruction, is a characteristic physiological pattern that should prompt clinicians to consider CPFE rather than attributing breathlessness solely to COPD [1-3]. Reliance on FEV? alone can obscure the true extent of parenchymal and vascular involvement, particularly when emphysema-related hyperinflation masks restriction. Management in CPFE is inherently anticipatory. Pulmonary hypertension is a central complication that may develop over time and can dominate prognosis, supporting a low threshold for repeat assessment when symptoms or physiological markers change [11]. Similarly, the increased risk of lung cancer necessitates disciplined follow-up of pulmonary nodules, particularly in older ex-smokers with emphysema and fibrotic change [12]. Acute deteriorations are often multifactorial, and distinguishing between infection, COPD exacerbation, cardiac failure, pulmonary embolism, and acute ILD exacerbation is crucial because treatment strategies differ substantially [6,9].
Figure 1,2: Representative axial non-contrast CT image. Areas of severe centrilobular and paraseptal emphysema are identified by focal regions of low attenuation without visible walls. Concurrent basal subpleural reticulation is present, seen as linear opacities parallel to the pleural surface. The juxtaposition of emphysema and basal fibrotic change demonstrates the characteristic imaging phenotype of CPFE.
Figure 3: Graphical representation of key pulmonary function abnormalities. The flow-volume loop demonstrates severe expiratory airflow obstruction with marked concavity. Lung volume indices illustrate pronounced hyperinflation with a markedly elevated residual volume. Gas transfer indices demonstrate severe DLCO reduction, reflecting disproportionate impairment in alveolar-capillary diffusion typical of CPFE.
A
notable nuance in this patient is the history of asbestos exposure and bibasal
pleural thickening, which raises the possibility of asbestos-related
pleuropulmonary disease. Accurate differentiation between asbestosis and other
fibrotic ILDs (including IPF) can be challenging and is best resolved through
ILD MDT review that integrates imaging pattern recognition with occupational
history and clinical context [4]. In summary, CPFE should be approached as more
than “COPD plus scarring.” Diagnostic recognition provides a framework for
surveillance, risk stratification, and holistic care planning that targets the
syndrome’s dominant complications and aims to preserve functional status and
quality of life (Figures 1-3).
Written
informed consent for publication of this de-identified case report and any
accompanying images will be obtained from the patient prior to submission. All
personal identifiers have been removed to protect patient confidentiality