Article Type : Research Article
Authors : Vassallo M, Hernandez E, Paez K, Mendoza S and Torres S
Keywords : Work environment; Surgery; Interpersonal relationships
Introduction: Interpersonal relationships
and organizational climate in a general surgery service influence patient
safety, professional satisfaction, and resident training performance. A
positive climate based on effective communication, respectful leadership, role
recognition, and interdisciplinary collaboration is described as improving team
cohesion, reducing errors, and promoting retention. In contrast, negative
environments generate conflict, overload, burnout, and a higher risk of adverse
events. Critical dimensions of the operating room are detailed: communication,
collaboration, leadership, and emotional management.
Methods: This approach is a conceptual
synthesis based on a literature review and clinical observations, integrating
findings from studies on organizational work climate and specific evidence from
the surgical environment to identify determining factors and practical
recommendations.
Discussion: The interaction between
leadership, communication, and resources conditions the quality of care.
Interventions such as communication training, briefing/ debriefing protocols,
non-punitive reporting systems, and psychosocial support can mitigate risks and
improve learning. The operating room requires specific strategies to manage
emotional burden and promote interdisciplinary coordination.
Conclusions: A positive organizational
climate in general surgery is essential to optimize patient safety, training,
and team sustainability; its improvement requires integrated actions in
leadership, communication, resource management, and psychosocial support.
Interpersonal
relationships in the workplace are the invisible network that binds teams
together. Bonds are established through respect, empathy, collaboration, and
effective communication, which not only benefit individual well-being but also
boost group performance. Research has revealed that a positive organizational
climate, based on healthy relationships, optimizes motivation, reduces stress,
and strengthens commitment to institutional goals. Technical competence is not
the only factor that determines effectiveness and harmony in a surgical
department, which is complex due to continuous exposure to pressure and
difficult, rapid decision-making. The quality of the work environment and the
interactions between people also play a significant role.
The
approach is a conceptual synthesis based on a literature review and clinical
observations, integrating findings from studies on organizational work climate
and specific evidence from the surgical environment to identify determining
factors and practical recommendations, in different scientific search engines
such as Google scholar, Medline, Pubmed, Scielo, to collect the respective
information (Table 1).
Interpersonal relationships in general surgery
Organizational climate is defined as the prevailing atmosphere among members of an organization, closely related to employee motivation and reflecting the motivational characteristics of the work environment. Similarly, it is proposed that the work environment reflects the values, attitudes, and beliefs of the organization's members, which in turn affect how people behave in their workplaces and how they perceive the company [1,2]. Productivity is affected by the work environment, which in turn is influenced by the manager's experience, employee performance, interpersonal relationships, and working conditions, as well as demographic and economic conditions.
Table 1: Impact of work climate on surgical performance and patient safety.
|
Positive
work environment |
negative
work environment |
|
Effective
and clear communication |
Poor
communication |
|
Participative
leadership |
Authoritarian
or absent leadership |
|
Teamwork
and collaboration |
Individualism
and conflicts |
|
Recognition
and support |
Lack of rewards and support |
|
Adequate
and equitable resources |
Resource scarcity and excessive workload |
|
Reduction of errors and complications |
Increased errors and adverse events |
|
Employee
satisfaction and retention |
Burnout,
turnover and absenteeism |
|
Improvement
in patient safety |
Increased risks in highly complex
procedures |
It
is emphasized that workplace productivity is fundamental because it motivates
employees by fostering specific dedication to the provision of goods or
services, and at the same time promotes individual participation to optimize
performance, which facilitates the relationship between managers and workers
[3]. The work environment, by taking into account and valuing the individual
perceptions and interests of employees in relation to organizational goals, is
gaining significant importance in the management strategies of different
companies. This results in important benefits for both parties. Over the years,
studies have shown how the work environment and interpersonal relationships directly
impact the short- and long-term results of companies, from different
perspectives, viewing people as an essential resource for a company's success
[4,5]. The reality of healthcare is no exception. The work environment in
hospitals, especially in the operating room, has emerged as a crucial element
for the quality of care, the functioning of surgical teams, and patient safety.
The importance of a healthy work environment for achieving optimal clinical
outcomes has been evidenced by the increasing complexity of surgical
procedures, the pressure on healthcare services, and the need for effective
interdisciplinary coordination. The motivation, satisfaction, and retention of
healthcare personnel, as well as the incidence of errors, complications, and
adverse events in surgery, are directly affected by the organizational climate,
as demonstrated by a variety of studies [3,5].
The operating room is a highly specialized and technologically advanced environment, distinguished by the need for precise coordination, rapid decision-making, and working under pressure. In this context, the work environment presents specific characteristics that arise from the interaction between various professional profiles (technicians, nurses, anesthesiologists, and surgeons), the operational hierarchy, the pressure of care, and exposure to critical circumstances [8].
The dimensions of the work environment in the operating room could depend on
According
to the literature, a positive work environment in the operating room is linked
to greater team cohesion, fewer errors, better emergency management, and
greater job satisfaction. Conversely, a negative environment has the potential
to cause conflict, tension, stress, and increase the likelihood of adverse
events [9]. Work has the capacity to play a positive role if it fosters
recognition and appreciation in the social sphere, leading to job satisfaction;
however, it can also be a source of dissatisfaction and psychological
suffering. There are situations in which teams experience interpersonal
relationships that generate dissatisfaction, especially in those where the
aforementioned premises are neither present nor developed [9].
Among the benefits of a healthy work environment and interpersonal relationships within the general surgery department, we can mention
The
work environment in general surgery comprises the relationships, perceptions,
and organizational conditions that influence how the surgical team works,
communicates, and makes decisions. A positive work environment fosters
professional satisfaction, improved training performance for residents, staff
retention, and patient safety; conversely, a negative one leads to higher staff
turnover, burnout, and errors. Some key aspects for developing this environment
include the leadership of the head of department, the culture of learning and
reporting, communication in the operating room, the balance between workload
and resources, educational support for residents, and fairness and recognition
at the organizational level. The work environment is strongly linked to
residents' job satisfaction and motivation; more favorable conditions increase
commitment, quality of care, and learning, while poor environments reduce the
quality of training and satisfaction.