Evaluation of Thyroid Stimulating Hormone and Free Thyroxine among Diabetes Mellitus Patients at Shendi Locality, Sudan Download PDF

Journal Name : SunText Review of Virology

DOI : 10.51737/2766-5003.2023.039

Article Type : Research Article

Authors : Osmana RAA, Khalida MO, Saeeda AA, Altahera TAA, Mahjafb GM, Gorishc BMT and Abdelmulad WIY

Keywords : Diabetes mellitus; Thyroid stimulating hormone; Free thyroxine; Thyroid hormones

Abstract

Background: Diabetes Mellitus is a group of metabolic diseases characterized by hyperglycemia resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both. Thyroid disease is found commonly in most forms of diabetes and is associated with advanced age, particularly in type 2 diabetes and underlying autoimmune disease in type 1 diabetes. Objective: This study aims to evaluate TSH and Free T4 among Diabetes Mellitus Patients in the Shendi locality, from August to December 2021.

Methodology: Thirty plasma samples were collected from diabetic patients of different ages and 20 plasma samples from healthy non-diabetic subjects of the same period for the cases of hormone comparison thyroid (TSH) and free T4. Thyroid hormone levels in the study were estimated using the 360 Automated Immunoassay Analyzer (TOSOH). And the results were analyzed using the computer program SPSS (Social Science Statistical Package).

Results: The result of this study showed that the mean concentration of TSH and Free T4 level in the diabetic subjects was (Mean ± SD): (1.6 ± 0.99) (13.5 ± 2.3) and control (2.0 ± 0.81) (12.5 ± 2.0) respectively with P. value =0.148, 0.124 which is insignificant. Also showed the mean concentration of TSH and FT4 according to gender is (1.6, 14.7) respectively for males (1.7, 12.7), and a female with P. value (0.718 for TSH which is insignificant) and (0.016 of Free T4 which is significant). There are an insignificant association of diabetes on TSH, and Free T4 levels with P. value (0.417, 0.277) respectively. And the significant association of the presence of hypertension on the level of TSH and FreeT4 with P. value (0.043, 0.018). Also the significant association of history on Free T4 level with P. value (0.018), insignificant on TSH level with P. value (0.773). Also showed the mean concentration of TSH, and FreeT4 with the intake of the treatment of diabetic and seafood, which was insignificant.

Conclusion: There is no statistical difference between TSH and FT4 levels between cases and controls. There was a correlation between FT4 levels and gender, with FT4 being higher in females than in males. FT4 is significantly elevated in patients with a family history of diabetes. No significant difference in FT4 levels by age.


Introduction

Materials and Methods

The present study was a cross-sectional, case-control study. Conducted in the Shendi locality, from August to November 2021, the study included Sudanese diabetes mellitus patients as a case group and healthy individuals as a control group. 30 Sudanese patients with diabetes mellitus were controlled as the study group and 20 healthy Sudanese were controlled. Their ages are (30–55 years old). Venous blood was collected using a sterile, single-use plastic syringe, the venipuncture site was washed with 70% ethanol, and the blood was placed in a heparin container and mixed gently. Each sample was centrifuged at 4000 (rpm) for 5 minutes to separate the plasma and stored at -20°C until analysis. TSH and Free T4 were estimated using Automated Immune assay Analyzer 360 (TOSOH).

Quality Control

The precision and accuracy of the method used in this study were checked and analyzed by commercially prepared control sera.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed by using the SPSS computer program. The means and standard deviations of serum levels of TSH, and free T4 were detected, and at-test was used for comparison (P. value of < 0.05 is significant).

Ethical Approval and Consent

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Board of the Faculty of Graduates Studies at Shendi University. The written informed consent form was obtained from each guardian of the participant as well as from the subject himself before recruitment into the study. All protocols in this study were done according to the Declaration of Helsinki (1964).

Results

The result of this study showed that the mean concentration of TSH and Free T4 level in the diabetic subjects was (Mean ± SD): (1.6 ± 0.99) (13.5 ± 2.3) and control (2.0 ± 0.81) (12.5 ± 2.0) respectively with P. value =0.148, 0.124 which is insignificant (Table 1,2). Also showed the mean concentration of TSH and FT4 according to gender level is (1.6, 14.7) respectively for males (1.7, 12.7), and a female (1.6, 14.7) with a P. value (of 0.718 TSH which is insignificant) and (0.016 of Free T4which is significant) (Table 3). There is an insignificant association of type of diabetic on TSH, Free T4 level with P. value (0.417, 0.277) respectively (Table 4,5). And the significant association of the presence of hypertension on the level of TSH and FreeT4 with P. value (0.043, 0.018) (Table 6). Also the significant association of history on Free T4 level with P. value (0.018), insignificant on TSH level with P. value (0.773) (Table 7). Also showed that the mean concentration of TSH, FreeT4 with intake in the treatment of diabetes was insignificant (Table 8).


Table 1: The Mean of TSH levels and St.d between case and control.

Variables

No

Mean ng\dl

St.d

P.value

Case

30

1.6

0.99

0.148

Control

20

2.0

0.81

Table 2: The Mean of FT4 levels and St.d between case and control.

Variables

No

Mean ng\dl

St.d

P.value

Case

30

13.5

2.3

0.124

Control

20

12.5

2.0

Table 3: The concentration of TSH and FT4 according to gender among case group.

Gender

Frequency

Percent %

Mean of TSH ng\dl

Mean of FT4 ng\dl

Male

12

40%

1.6

14.7

Female

18

60%

1.7

12.7

P. value

0.718

0.016

Table 4: The concentration of TSH and FT4 according to Age among case group.

Age

No

Mean of TSH ng\dl

Mean of FT4 ng\dl

30-40

2

2.5

13.8

41-50

12

1.6

14.8

51-60

16

1.6

12.6

P. value

0.456

0.035

Table 5: The concentration of TSH and FT4 according to Type of diabetic mellitus among case group.

Type of diabetic mellitus

Mean of TSH ng\dl

Mean of FT4 ng\dl

Type1

1.9

12.8

Type2

1.5

13.8

P. value

0.417

0.277

Table 6: The concentration of TSH and FT4 according to presence of hypertension among case group.

Hypertension

Mean of TSH ng\dl

Mean of FT4 ng\dl

Yes

2.1

12.7

No

1.4

13.9

P. value

0.043

0.018

 

 

 

Table 7: The concentration of TSH and FT4 according to history of diabetes among case group.

History of D.M

Mean of TSH ng\dl

Mean of FT4 ng\dl

Yes

1.7

14.0

No

1.5

11.6

P. value

0.773

0.018

Table 8: The concentration of TSH and FT4 according to uses of medication of D.M among case group.

Treatment of D.M

Mean of TSH ng\dl

Mean of FT4 ng\dl

Regular

1.8

13.5

Irregular

1.2

13.6

P. value

0.213

0.902


Discussion

Diabetes mellitus and thyroid abnormalities are the two most prevalent endocrine diseases [15]. Diabetes is one the fastest growing non-communicable metabolic syndrome which is characterized by the increased blood glucose level and is mainly due to a reduction of insulin secretion or suppression in insulin action. It is global health anxiety, and its incidences are increasing [16]. This cross-sectional case-control descriptive study was conducted from July to November 2021 in Shendi City to assess thyroid status and understand the association between thyroid disease and diabetes mellitus. The population included 50 of his participants in the study, 30 of whom were diabetic and 20 of whom were healthy as controls. There are 12 male and 18 female representatives. Serum samples were collected in heparinized containers. Thyroid hormone levels in this study were estimated using the Automated Immune Assay Analyzer 360 (TOSOH). The results were analyzed using the Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) computer program. The results of this study showed that there was no significant difference in TSH and FT4 levels between diabetic and non-diabetic subjects (P. value = 0.148 and 0.124, respectively). This result is in agreement with the result obtained by Islam and her colleague in South East Asia (2008), who denoted that there is no significant statistical difference in TSH and FT4 levels among diabetic and non-diabetic participants [17]. This result was opposed to a study carried out by Panneerselvam and his collage in 2015, they showed that serum levels of FT4 were significantly lower in diabetic subjects as compared to the non-diabetic subjects while serum level of TSH was found to be significantly higher in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients as compared to normal individuals [13]. Refluxes that different in results to a geographical area or environmental difference between countries. Also, there is a correlation between FT4 level and gender, the level of FT4 increased in males (Mean =14.7) than in females (Mean=12.7) with a statistically significant difference between them (P. value =0.016) this result consensus with Kaur I and his team’s 2017, said that hypothyroidism is frequently observed and most commonly seen in female patients [5]. Although there are statistically insignificant differences between the level of TSH and the gender (P.value= 0.718) and this was infringing with a study carried out by Uppal Vand and his classmates Said Hypothyroidism was more common in females (15%) than in males (4%) [18]. these differences belong to Thyroid hormone levels may be altered by various medications that diabetic subjects used to take and determine the change in body composition. Moreover, there was a statistically significant difference in FT4 according to age (P. value=0.035) and this is agreed by SU Ogbonna 2010 and his colleague were show that T2DM increases were prevalent with age. Also, there are no differences in age in TSH between diabetic patients with (P. value=0.456) this disagree with the study carried out by Khalid S Aljabri who said there was a statistically non-significant difference between thyroid dysfunctions in males compared to females (P<0.0001) [19]. This might be due to the sociodemographic and lifestyle differences in the represented populations. Also this study show, there is no variation among type one diabetic and type two in the level of TSH, and FT4 with insignificant value (P. value= 0.456)( P. value = 0.277) respectively this result differs from the study conducted by Mirella Hage, and his team It has been shown that thyroid dysfunctions are more prevalent in people with diabetes and particularly type 1 diabetes this belong to social status or the genetic factor of the population who shared in the study [20]. The result of conducted study denoted that there is a significant statistical variation of diabetic people were have hypertension disease with (P. value =0.043) of TSH and (P. value= 0.014) of FT4, this is close to the study carried by Pradeep Talwalkar and his pals in India 2019, reported a high prevalence of hypothyroidism in patients with T2DM (24.8%), hypertension (33.5%), and T2DM + hypertension (28.9%) [21]. on another hand, there is a significant difference between the history of diabetes in FT4 with (P. value= 0.018) and no difference in TSH level. In this conducted study there was no different statistical study in patients who intake the treatment of diabetes in the level of TSH and FT4 with insignificant value (P. value= 0.213), (0.902) respectively and this is not accepted with a study conducted in Iraq in 2019 by Khalid Ibrahim Al-Lehibi and his college were accessed to metformin has a significant TSH lowering effect in hypothyroid patients. This change in result probably back to variation in physical activities or nutrition status [22].


Conclusions

There is no statistical difference between TSH and FT4 levels between cases and controls. There was a correlation between FT4 levels and gender, with FT4 being higher in females than in males. FT4 is significantly elevated in patients with a family history of diabetes. No significant difference in her FT4 levels by age.


Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Department of Clinical chemistry, Faculty of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Shendi University, Shendi, Sudan, for their support during the study period.


Sources of Funding

There was no specific grant for this research from any funding organization in the public, private, or nonprofit sectors.


Competing Interests

Authors have declared that no competing interests exist.


References

  1. Vasudevan DM, Sreekumari S, Vaidyanathan K. Textbook of biochemistry for medical students. Jaypee brothers Med publishers; 2019.
  2. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes care. 2015; 38: S8-S16.
  3. Beran D, Yudkin JS. Diabetes care in sub-Saharan Africa. The Lancet. 2006; 368: 1689-1695.
  4. Elbagir MN, Eltom MA, Elmahadi EM, Kadam IM, Berne C. A population-based study of the prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in adults in northern Sudan. Diabetes care. 1996; 19:1126-1128.
  5. Kumar PP. Treatment of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis with herbal medication. Int J Gre Phar (IJGP). 2017; 11.
  6. Sharma A, Devi S, Singh K, Prabhakar PK. Correlation of body mass index with thyroid-stimulating hormones in thyroid patient. Asian J Pharm Cli Res. 2018; 27: 65-68.
  7. Vyas M. Physicochemical analysis of leaves of Eriobotrya japonica and antioxidant and antidiabetic evaluation of its methanolic extract. Int J Gre Pharm (IJGP). 2019; 13.
  8. Singh G, Gupta V, Sharma AK, Gupta N. Evaluation of thyroid dysfunction among type 2 diabetic Punjabi population. Advbiores. 2011; 2: 3-9.
  9. Parsaik AK, Singh B, Roberts RO, Pankratz S, Edwards KK, Geda YE. Hypothyroidism and risk of mild cognitive impairment in elderly persons: a population-based study. JAMA neurol. 2014; 71: 201-207.
  10. Greenspan FS.  Basic and Clinical Endocrinology.5th ed. Appleton and Lange. 2017; 192-262.
  11. Brent GA. The molecular basis of thyroid hormone action. New Engl J Med. 1994; 331: 847-853.
  12. Dietrich JW, Brisseau K, Boehm BO. Resorption, Transport und Bioverfügbarkeit von Schilddrüsenhormonen. DMW-Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008; 133: 1644-1648.
  13. Geetha R, Anitha D, Swamy NR, Panneerselvam TT. The Study of Thyroid Dysfunction among Type 2 Diabetic Patients Venkatachalam Ramesh. Int J Curr Res Aca Rev. 2015; 3:14-18.
  14. Makandar A, Sonagra AD, Shafi N. Study of thyroid function in type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic population. Int J Med Sci Publ Healt. 2015; 4: 769-72.
  15. Satyanarayana N, Mudda A, Kumar J. Prevalence of thyroid dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in tertiary care centre. J  Evol  Med Dent Sci. 2014; 3: 4160-4167.
  16. Deokar PG, Nagdeote AN, Lanje MJ, Basutkar DG. Prevalence of thyroid disorders in a tertiary care center. Int J Cur Res Revi. 2016; 8: 26.
  17. Islam S, Yesmine S, Khan SA, Alam NH, Islam S. A comparative study of thyroid hormone levels in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2008; 39: 913-916.
  18. Uppal V, Vij C, Bedi GK, Vij A, Banerjee BD. Thyroid disorders in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ind J Cli Biochem. 2013; 28: 336-341.
  19. Aljabri KS. The Prevalence of Thyroid Disorders in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Saudi Community Based Hospital. Cur Res Diab Obe J. 2019; 11: 60-64.
  20. Hage M, Zantout MS, Azar ST. Thyroid disorders and diabetes mellitus. J thyroid res. 2011.
  21. Talwalkar P, Deshmukh V, Bhole M. Prevalence of hypothyroidism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension in India: a cross-sectional observational study. Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity: targets and therapy. 2019; 12: 369-376.
  22. Al-Lehibi KI, Abdulrahman MI, Albassam EN. Thyroid dysfunction in type 2 diabetic patients and the effect of diabetes duration and anti-glycemic medications on mean TSH and A1c levels: a retrospective study. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2019; 8:117-122.