Article Type : Research Article
Authors : Weimer LE, Cattari G, Fanales Belasio E, Cuccuru E and Vidili G
Keywords : Monoclonal Antibodies; Early treatment; Prophylaxis
Despite the end of the pandemic, COVID-19 continues to pose a serious health threat. Most individuals have established robust immune protection and do not develop severe disease but the infection can still lead to marked and sometimes long-lasting disease symptoms. In the late summer of 2023 a new SARS-CoV-2 variant emerged, BA.2.86 (Pirola), which, based on genetics, differs markedly from all previously circulating variants. As the New Year takes off, CDC continues to track the rise of JN.1 across the World. An offspring of BA.2.86, JN.1 is now the most widely circulating variant of SARS-CoV-2 in the United States and globally. At this time, there is no evidence that JN.1 causes more severe disease. As of December 2024, JN.1 is estimated to account for approximately 62% (range 55-68%) of all currently circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants, an increase from the estimated prevalence of 44% (range 39-50%) two weeks ago. CDC is also observing an increase in the prevalence of JN.1 in international travelers and wastewater viral levels, as well as in most regions around the globe. The challenges of outpatient administration and associated costs, Monoclonal Antibodies were a mainstay of the COVID-19 armamentarium from November 2020, when bamlanivimab first received US Food and Drug Administration emergency use authorization (EUA), through November 2022 [1-3]. Ideal qualities of treatments include effectiveness in preventing hospitalization and death, safety and tolerability for patients, easy administration in the outpatient environment, and cost-effectiveness. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that neutralize SARS-CoV-2 fit the safety and efficacy profile in early randomized clinical trials. This minireview of Clinical Experience explain the importance of Monoclonal Antibodies as Prophylaxis and Therapy areThe Best Opportunity to change the Clinical History in the Sars-Cov-2 Variants Era
COVID-19,
the illness caused by SARS-CoV-2, emerged in late 2019 and spread very quickly
across the globe. Within the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic, more
than 774 million cases were reported worldwide. By December 2024, Omicron
subvariants, particularly XBB and BQ.1, remain the primary variants of concern,
continuing to evolve with significant immune-evasion properties. Though they
generally cause milder illness compared to earlier variants like Delta, these
subvariants continue to present challenges, especially in the context of
reinfections. Early research data from multiple labs are reassuring and show
that existing antibodies work against the new variants. These data are also
encouraging because of what it may mean for the effectiveness of the 2023-2024
COVID-19 vaccine [4-5]. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the anti-SARS-CoV-2
spike (S) protein are prescribed in high-income countries to prevent severe
disease in at-risk patients. Although studies report efficacy as between 50–85%
[6], global access is currently largely inequitable. Multivariant omicron
(B.1.1.529) and subvariant (BA.2 followed by BA.4 and BA.5) dominance has
challenged the treatment landscape for mild-to-moderate disease, introducing
considerable certainty on the efficacy of monoclonal antibodies [7-8] and
leading to changes to initial recommendations for some of them.
Contemporaneously, oral, direct-acting antivirals with a reported efficacy
ranging from 30% (molnupiravir) to 89–90% (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) have
recently received conditional or emergency approval in some countries and been
recommended in international guidelines such as the World Health Organization
guidelines. S-217622, also known as ensitrelvir, a 3CL protease inhibitor that
has been shown to significantly reduce the infectious viral load, is currently
in phase 3 trials and waiting for emergency approval in Japan and should be
submitted soon in China. The main purpose of this opinion paper is to highlight
the possible strategies to optimize and protect current and future therapeutic
options to treat the most vulnerable patients.
Emerging Variants of Concern
(VOC)
Several
variants of concern (VOCs), such as Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), Delta
(B.1.617.2), Omicron (B.1.1.529), and its subvariants, have shown significant
changes in the spike protein, the primary target for many monoclonal
antibodies. These variants have displayed varying degrees of resistance to
neutralization by monoclonal antibodies that were effective against earlier
strains. The Omicron subvariants, in particular, have presented substantial
challenges due to their increased transmissibility and the ability to evade
immune responses.
Key Variants of Concern (VOCs) in
December 2024
Omicron
Subvariants (still dominant)
While
the Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) originally emerged in late 2021, it continues
to dominate globally due to its high transmissibility and ability to evade some
immune defenses. As of December 2024, several Omicron subvariants have emerged,
each with unique mutations in the spike protein and other regions of the
genome. Some of these subvariants have shown increased resistance to immunity
induced by previous infections and vaccines [8,9].
The
dominant subvariants include
XBB
Subline ages
· XBB.1.5 (also known as "Kraken")
remains one of the most prominent Omicron sublineages. It has demonstrated
increased transmissibility compared to earlier Omicron variants and some
resistance to neutralizing antibodies. However, vaccines and previous immunity
still offer protection against severe disease.
· XBB.2 and XBB.2.3: These
subvariants are part of the broader XBB lineage, with XBB.2.3 showing increased
immune evasion, potentially making reinfections more likely, though severe
cases remain relatively rare with timely treatment.
BA.4
and BA.5 Subvariants
· BA.5
still circulates in some regions, albeit at lower frequencies compared to newer
Omicron subvariants like XBB. It remains associated with breakthrough
infections, especially in individuals who received vaccines targeting older
versions of the virus.
BQ.1
and BQ.1.1
· These
subvariants were widely discussed earlier in 2024 due to their increased immune
evasion properties, making them capable of partially escaping immunity from
both vaccination and prior infection. They represent a continued evolution of
the Omicron lineage and are a significant concern in terms of reinfection
rates.
Potential New Variants to Watch
While
Omicron continues to dominate, researchers have been keeping an eye on new
variants that may emerge from different branches of the viral tree. As
SARS-CoV-2 evolves, the likelihood of new variants that could impact public
health increases. Here are some emerging variants and key features:
BA.2.86
(Pirola)
· This
variant, also known as Pirola, has gained attention due to its significant
mutations in the spike protein, leading to concerns over immune evasion. It’s
still unclear how it will perform in terms of transmissibility and severity,
but some evidence suggests it may evade immunity from both vaccines and prior
infections. However, as of December 2024, BA.2.86 hasn't spread as rapidly as
other Omicron subvariants.
Centaurus
(BA.2.75)
· Although
BA.2.75 (Centaurus) was initially identified in mid-2022, newer subvariants
within this lineage have continued to evolve. Some studies indicate potential
immune evasion, particularly among individuals who have been vaccinated with
the original mRNA vaccines.
Other
Potential Variants
· Experts
are watching for new lineages from both Omicron and pre-Omicron strains, though
variants like Alpha, Delta, and Beta have become much less common as Omicron
continues to dominate.
Key Features of Omicron
Subvariants in December 2024
Several
important features of these Omicron subvariants are crucial to understanding
their behavior:
· Immune Evasion:
One of the defining characteristics of recent Omicron subvariants, such as XBB
and BQ.1, is their ability to partially evade immunity from both vaccination
and prior infections. This means that even if people have been vaccinated or previously
infected with SARS-CoV-2, they can still become reinfected.
· Transmissibility:
Omicron subvariants tend to have high transmissibility compared to earlier
variants, including Delta. This increased transmissibility continues to drive
outbreaks in some areas, although public health measures and vaccination
efforts have helped mitigate the impact.
· Vaccine Efficacy:
Vaccines based on the original strain of SARS-CoV-2 may offer reduced
protection against infection with newer subvariants. However, the vaccines
still provide strong protection against severe disease, hospitalization, and
death. The availability of updated (bivalent) vaccines that target Omicron
lineages has helped improve protection against these subvariants.
· Severity:
Overall, Omicron subvariants appear to cause less severe disease than earlier
variants like Delta, particularly in individuals with immunity from vaccination
or prior infection. However, certain groups, such as the elderly,
immunocompromised individuals, and those with underlying health conditions,
still face a higher risk of severe illness
Recent Scientific Findings on the
Immunology of New Variants of Sars-Cov-2: JN.1 and BA.2.86
Because
of the sequence divergence of BA.2.86, there was initial concern of a
significant reduction in antibody activity. Preliminary data from
laboratory-studies from multiple investigators suggest similar antibody
activity against BA.2.86 as compared to other currently circulating viruses. CDC and other experts
are reassured by these research findings that support the effectiveness of this
type of immunity against this variant. Additionally, based on CDC’s experience
with past SARS-CoV-2 variants, people will likely have protection against
severe disease mediated by both cellular and antibody immunity. Real-world data are needed to fully
understand the impact given the complexities of the immune response to this
variant. Additional studies on this are ongoing, and we expect to learn more in
upcoming weeks.
New study sheds light on the
biological properties of new COVID variant BA.2.86 (Pirola) and JN.1
The
researchers discovered that the Pirola variant, in contrast the all previously
circulating Omicron variants, enters lung cells with high efficiency and uses
the cellular enzyme TMPRSS2 for entry, thereby exhibiting surprising parallels
to variants Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Delta that circulated during the first years
of the pandemic. The improved entry into lung cells might indicate that the
virus is more aggressive but production of new, infectious viral particles in
infected cells was reduced, which may limit spread and pathogenic potential.
Finally, the researchers report that the Pirola variant is resistant against
all therapeutic antibodies and efficiently evades antibody responses in vaccinated
individuals with and without breakthrough infection. However, the virus was
appreciably inhibited by antibodies elicited by the new, XBB.1.5-adpated mRNA
vaccine. In summary, the results show that four years after the start of the
pandemic the virus is still capable of profound changes and can reacquire
properties which may promote the development of severe disease [9]. The
spread of SARS-CoV-2 is associated with the constant emergence of new viral
variants. These variants have acquired mutations in the spike protein, which
allow evasion of neutralizing antibodies in vaccinated and convalescent
individuals. The emergence of viral variants started with the Alpha variant
followed by the Beta, Gamma and Delta variant. At the end of the year 2021 the
Omicron variant became globally dominant, which, based on genome sequence,
differed markedly from previously circulating variants. However, the virus had
to pay a price for this massive change. Thus, the Omicron variant evades
neutralizing antibodies and is transmitted with high efficiency but has lost
the ability to efficiently use a host cell enzyme, the protease TMPRSS2, for
lung cell entry. As a consequence, the Omicron variant induces pneumonia less
frequently. CDC and other experts are reassured by these research
findings that support the effectiveness of this type of immunity against this
variant. Additionally, based on CDC’s experience with past SARS-CoV-2 variants,
people will likely have protection against severe disease mediated by both
cellular and antibody immunity.
Real-world data are needed to fully understand the impact given the
complexities of the immune response to this variant. Additional studies on this
are ongoing, and we expect to learn more in upcoming weeks [10].
BA.2.86 (Pirola) and JN1: A
quantum leap in SARS-CoV-2 evolution
Descendants
of the Omicron variant dominated globally until the end of the year 2023. New
variants frequently differed only by few mutations from their predecessors and
there was evidence that viruses circulating in 2023 had only limited options to
evade antibody pressure in the human population. Therefore, the discovery of a
new SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariant, Pirola (BA.2.86), which, based on genome
sequence, strongly differed from other circulating viruses drew a lot of
attention. The Pirola variant, analogous to the Omicron variant, likely arose
in immunocompromised patients and presents a quantum leap in SARS-CoV-2
evolution. The spike protein of the Pirola variant harbors more than 30
mutations relative to its precursor variant, BA.2, and it is largely unknown
how these mutations affect the biological properties of the virus.
BA.2.86 (Pirola) and JN1 can
infect lung cells more efficiently
The
researchers discovered that the Pirola variant, in contrast to all previously
circulating Omicron subvariants, enters lung cells with high efficiency and in
a TMPRSS2-dependent manner. Further, they could demonstrate that mutations S50L
and K356T in the spike protein of the Pirola variant are important for the
highly efficient lung cell entry. "It is noteworthy that two years after
the global dominance of the Omicron variant, which fails to robustly enter lung
cells, now a quite different virus is spreading and that this virus is able to
again enter lung cells with high efficiency. If the augmented lung cell entry
translates into more severe disease upon infection with the Pirola variant
remains to be investigated in animal models," says Stefan Pöhlmann, head
of the Infection Biology Unity of the German Primate Center.
BA.2.86
(Pirola) and JN1 replicates less well than its predecessors
SARS-CoV-2
infected cells produce new virus particles many of which, but not all, are able
to infect new cells. The researchers provided evidence that cells infected by
the Pirola variant are less well able than cells infected with previous
variants to produce intact viral particles. The relatively
inefficient production of infectious particles by cells infected with the
Pirola variant was surprising. It will be interesting to analyze which
mechanism is responsible. Maybe the infected cells produce defective
interfering parti.
Signs and symptoms of new
variants
The
version of the Covid-19 virus behind the latest spike in infections shares many
of the same symptoms as earlier variants of Sars-CoV-2: a sore throat, fatigue,
headache and a cough. Differences in the symptoms often depend on a person's
underlying health and their immune system. But some researchers are reporting
among the most common first signs of an infection by JN.1 are diarrhoea or a headache.
Fewer patients are losing their sense of smell with variants closely-related to
Omicron, of which JN.1 is a subvariant. When Covid first came, it was
characterised by these very odd, vague symptoms – from brain fog, feeling
exhausted, and losing taste and smell. Now it's mutated to more similar
symptoms to the flu, where it's very difficult clinically to distinguish
between the two. The virus isn't necessarily less pathogenicRather, it's
infecting a population that are less inclined to become sick, because they've
seen Sars-CoV-2 before, and they're better at regulating immune response against it. The major lesson
over the course of the pandemic is that the symptoms which appear in patients
are highly dependent on prior immune status. In the first two years of
Covid-19, the responses of an individual patient to the virus were primarily
dictated by their state of immune health, along with prior exposure to other
coronaviruses. The major lesson over the course of the pandemic is that the
symptoms which appear in patients are highly dependent on prior immune status.
In the first two years of Covid-19, the responses of an individual patient to
the virus were primarily dictated by their state of immune health, along with
prior exposure to other coronaviruses. Now, in 2024, this is determined by a
much more complex cocktail of factors, including how many times that person has
already been infected by the virus, their vaccination status, and whether their
vaccination-induced immunity might be on the wane. As a result, the people now
experiencing Covid-19 for the very first time are at greater risk, especially
if it has been a while since their last booster vaccine. There are still people
who have somehow managed to remain completely Covid-näive. If they are unvaccinated
or under vaccinated, they stand to have the highest risk of severe and
protracted symptoms. Still, Sars-CoV-2 is also constantly mutating, something
which is also subtly shifting how it attempts to invade the human body. The
JN.1 variant has an elevated ability to evade the immune system, for example,
compared to other Omicron sub-variants. But this is also altering the way it
affects the human body.
The Systemic Complications of
Jn.1
One
of the ongoing concerns remains the virus' ability to cause damage to blood
vessels and internal organs through the creation of micro clots. In
2023, researchers at Virginia Commonwealth University's School of Medicine
reported that people now being infected with Omicron-related subvariants are
just 6-7% as likely to lose their sense of smell or taste, compared to
infections by the virus in the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic. Instead,
some researchers that patients are more likely to present either with diarrhoea
or a headache having been infected with JN.1 or the EG.5 variants. There
has been a huge shift in viral tropism, meaning which cells get infected. And
that's governed by the sequence of the spike protein. Almost everybody in the
world has been infected or vaccinated, so the virus is under huge pressure to
escape those immune responses to continue to transmit, so the spike protein has
evolved a lot. This leads to it infecting different cells to gain entry, which
is why people aren't losing their smell or taste anymore. Researchers
are still trying to figure out whether some more subtle, internal consequences
of Sars-CoV-2 infection varies between variants of the virus or whether any
differences are more driven by the waning of previous vaccine-induced
protection. One of the ongoing concerns remains the virus' ability to cause
damage to blood vessels and internal organs through the creation of micro
clots, with the kidney – an organ which is constructed of approximately one
million tiny blood vessels – seemingly particularly vulnerable based on the
patients Strain has seen. We are seeing more microvascular complications and a
step change in the kidney function with the new JN.1 variant that does appear
to be worse than the past couple of variants. But it's difficult to say whether
it's the variant, or the fact its 18 months to two years now since a lot of
people last received a vaccine.
Protecting Emerging Treatment
Options
Several
crucial issues warrant urgent attention to optimize the use of these emerging
treatment options (Figure 1). First, as proven to be transformational for HIV,
rapid, affordable access to early antiviral treatment to slow the tide of new
variants is critical to effective “test-and-treat” strategies to protect the
most fragile patients and avoid a severe and/or persistent infection. After
more than 2 years of pandemic, progress has been slow [11] and public health
attention has recently been attracted by the low-profile agreement during the)
in Geneva in May 2022.
Together
with vaccination, early diagnosis and treatment have the ability to reduce
disease worsening, to reduce transmission and to constrain variability in viral
sequences. Second, although the combined effect of omicron and
increasing vaccine deployment in some regions has shifted the demand response
from hospital to outpatient care, considerable uncertainty exists about who is
now at risk for severe omicron disease [12]. While the risk/benefit ratio
across at-risk subpopulations has unquestionably changed in vaccinated
populations, gains made can only be preserved if those at highest risk are
rapidly diagnosed and receive treatment in less than one week. Third,
high levels of antiviral efficacy will be critically important, especially in
immunocompromised patients who are grossly underrepresented in registrational
trials [13]. Causes of immunosuppression are diverse (including organ/stem cell
transplants, cancer, immunosuppressive medications or uncontrolled HIV) and
these patients represent a significant proportion of the population, e.g., 7
million adults in the USA [14] , but also in low- and middle-income countries
due to the high prevalence of uncontrolled HIV. Overall, the mortality risk
with omicron is still unclear, but protection of those who cannot be
effectively vaccinated or protected by a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection remains
imperative. Importantly, in regions where HIV is highly prevalent, there is a
clear need and opportunity to reinforce HIV epidemic control by prompt
diagnosis and sustained viral suppression with antiretrovirals, key factors to
also enable the control of SARS COV-2 spread in this group. Although
there are many other causes for variant emergence (host jump or adaptation,
vaccine exposure, to name the most frequent), data confirm that
immunocompromised patients with long-term SARS-CoV-2 replication are
particularly susceptible to resistance and transmissible variant emergence. The
emergence of resistance mutation thus impacting treatment efficacy is more
likely if a patient has been exposed to specific antiviral drugs. In addition,
it remains unclear if the small percent rebound occurrence (2%) observed with
nirmatrelvir/r in the EPIC-HR (Evaluation of Protease Inhibition for COVID-19
in High-Risk Patients) trial, performed in the delta variant era, is
underestimating a risk that would be particularly of concern in patients
harboring an impaired immune system and in the omicron era. In one recent case
series, one out of 7 patients who had a virologic rebound also had an
immunosuppressing condition. Another recent case series revealed that all three
patients with viral rebound were highly immunocompromised. This potentially
raises concerns about the need of longer antiviral courses, especially in these
patients. Preclinical data have clearly demonstrated that
virological efficacy is higher for combinations of existing antiviral drugs
than single agents. To achieve the goal of changing the treatment guidelines in
SARS-CoV-2-infected immunocompromised individuals, independent and academic
clinical trials for drug combinations should be considered as an urgent, unmet
research priority. Today, collaboration with industry to allow early access to
antiviral drugs to be combined has been an objective still to be achieved.
Certain potent monoclonal antibodies, such as bebtelovimab, cannot even be
accessed for research or for routine care outside of the USA [15-16].
Latest Monoclonal Antibodies and
Their Efficacy against New Variants
Recent
developments in monoclonal antibody therapies have focused on targeting newer
variants of SARS-CoV-2. Here are some of the most promising monoclonal
antibodies currently under investigation or authorized for use:
Bebtelovimab
· Target:
The spike protein, specifically the receptor-binding domain (RBD).
· Efficacy:
Bebtelovimab has shown activity against several Omicron subvariants, including
BA.2 and BA.4/BA.5. However, its efficacy has been reduced against some more
recent Omicron sublineages, leading to evolving recommendations for its use.
· Indication:
It has been authorized for use in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 who
are at high risk of progressing to severe disease, including those who are
immunocompromised or elderly.
Evusheld (AstraZeneca's
tixagevimab and cilgavimab)
· Target:
The spike protein.
· Efficacy:
This combination has been shown to be effective against many variants,
including Omicron, and is currently used both for pre-exposure prophylaxis and
post-exposure treatment in high-risk individuals. However, recent studies
indicate that its efficacy against newer Omicron subvariants (e.g., XBB) may be
reduced.
· Indication:
Recommended for immunocompromised individuals who may not respond well to
vaccination or who are at increased risk of exposure.
Casirivimab and Imdevimab
(REGEN-COV)
· Target:
The spike protein, blocking the virus from entering human cells.
· Efficacy:
This combination has demonstrated variable effectiveness against the Omicron
variants, with significant reductions in neutralization against some
subvariants. As a result, the FDA withdrew its emergency use authorization
(EUA) for this mAb for treatment of COVID-19 in certain regions.
· Indication:
Previously used for mild to moderate cases in high-risk patients, but less
relevant with the emergence of resistant variants.
Sotrovimab
· Target:
The spike protein.
· Efficacy:
Sotrovimab was initially effective against several VOCs, but its efficacy
against Omicron and its subvariants (particularly BA.4/BA.5) is now limited.
The monoclonal antibody is no longer authorized in regions where Omicron
subvariants predominate.
· Indication:
Earlier used for mild to moderate COVID-19 treatment in high-risk patients, but
replaced by more effective alternatives in most settings.
Arctivimab and Cilgavimab
(Bamlanivimab, Etesevimab)
·
Target: Spike protein.
·
Efficacy: This combination showed reduced
efficacy against Omicron and its subvariants. However, they remain relevant for earlier strains like Delta.
·
Indication: Previously used in high-risk
populations, but largely superseded by newer agents due to reduced
effectiveness against current VOCs.
Use in Immunocompromised and Elderly Populations
Immunocompromised
and elderly patients are at a heightened risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes, and
many do not respond adequately to vaccines. Monoclonal antibodies provide an
important therapeutic option for these groups, particularly in preventing
disease progression and reducing hospitalization rates [17].
Immunocompromised
Patients
· Individuals
with conditions such as cancer, HIV/AIDS, or those undergoing immunosuppressive
treatments (e.g., organ transplant recipients) may not mount an adequate immune
response to vaccination. For these patients, monoclonal antibodies can serve as
a critical bridge to protection.
· Monoclonal
antibody treatments, such as Evusheld, have been used for pre-exposure prophylaxis
in these individuals, offering protection against infection and severe disease.
However, as new variants emerge, updated monoclonal antibody therapies that can
effectively neutralize these strains are critical.
Elderly Patients
· Elderly
individuals, particularly those over the age of 65, are at higher risk of
severe disease due to age-related decline in immune function and the presence
of comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease.
· Monoclonal
antibodies have shown a role in both treatment and prevention in this group,
providing significant benefits when administered early in the course of
infection.
· As
with immunocompromised patients, it is important that monoclonal antibody
treatments are updated to address the evolving viral landscape, particularly in
the face of more immune-evasive variants
Challenges and Limitations
· Resistance to New Variants:
One of the main challenges is the growing resistance of newer variants to
existing monoclonal antibodies. As the virus continues to evolve, there is an
ongoing need for the development of monoclonal antibodies that can target
conserved regions of the spike protein or other viral components.
· Distribution and Accessibility:
The availability of monoclonal antibodies varies by region, and distribution to
high-risk populations, especially in low-resource settings, remains a
challenge.
· Side Effects and Safety:
While monoclonal antibodies generally have a favorable safety profile, some
side effects, such as allergic reactions, are possible. Careful monitoring is
required, particularly for immunocompromised and elderly patients who may have
other health conditions.
Current Public Health Measures
Vaccines and
Boosters
· Updated
vaccines (e.g., bivalent vaccines) that target both the original strain and
Omicron variants are crucial tools in preventing severe illness. These vaccines
are being updated periodically to address the evolving variants.
Testing
and Surveillance
· Ongoing
genomic surveillance is vital to detect emerging variants quickly. Public
health authorities closely monitor the emergence of new variants and provide
updated guidance based on the virus's behavior.
Treatment
and Therapeutics
· Treatments
like monoclonal antibodies and antiviral drugs (e.g., Paxlovid) are still used
to manage severe cases, particularly in high-risk populations. However, the
effectiveness of some monoclonal antibodies has been reduced against certain
variants, prompting the development of new treatments.
Public
Health Guidelines
Masking,
social distancing, and other preventative measures are still recommended in
certain settings, especially in areas with high transmission rates or when
dealing with vulnerable populations.
Conclusion
The
ongoing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants necessitates the continuous development
of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that can neutralize new and emerging strains.
For immunocompromised patients, mAbs like Evusheld, Bebtelovimab, and newer
combination therapies offer crucial options for prevention and treatment,
especially for those at high risk of severe disease. As the virus continues to
mutate, ongoing research, including the development of bispecific new
monoclonal antibodies and long-acting therapies, will be key to improving
outcomes in these vulnerable populations. The future research into new variants
and improved vaccines will be critical in preventing future surges and
mitigating the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on global health.
10. United
States Food Drug Administration. FDA updates Sotrovimab emergency use
authorization. FDA. 2022.
11. World
Health Organization. Therapeutics and COVID-19: living guideline. 2022
16. Bloomberg.
Pfizer's Grip on Paxlovid Thwarts Research on Covid Treatment. 2022.
17.
Invivyd Submits Request for
Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to U.S. FDA for VYD222 for the Pre-Exposure
Prevention of COVID-19 in Immunocompromised Adults and Adolescents. Invivyd
press release. 2024.