Article Type : Research Article
Authors : Razean Haireen MR, Siti Noor Aishikin AH, Nur Zainih JJ, Rawaida R, Norma H, Nurul Afza K, Faizah SAR, Mohd Nazri B, Anuar A, Mohd Aziz R, Izyani R and Nurul Ain A
Keywords : Aphid; Chives; Sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (SPCSV); Sweet potato feathery mottle virus (SPFMV); Whitefly
Background: Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) is well known nutritious and healthy source of food that reported vulnerable to viral diseases worldwide including Malaysia. Management of pest vector that responsible for the transfer of virus disease is really important in sweet potato planting. Aphid transmits Sweet potato feathery mottle virus (SPFMV) meanwhile whitefly transmits Sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (SPCSV). SPFMV when singly or mix with other viruses had caused reduction in the quantity and quality of the sweet potato tubers. Objectives: Aims of this study is to control the pest vector using plants compounds with pesticidal effect to repel pests.
Materials: Chives (Allium tuberosum) were planted in companion to sweet potato as a prophylactic measure to manage the pest vectors responsible for the transfer of virus disease at farmer plot in Semenyih, Selangor. A total number of 192 bags of chives were planted companion to sweet potato in a ratio 1:2 as repellent crop. Partial budgeting on the effect of sweet potato planting with chives was evaluated. Results: Sweet potato planted with chives showed lower mean number of aphid and whitefly when compared to mean number for aphid and whitefly in the control plants (sweet potato without chives). A lower virus incidence percentage was also significantly observed in sweet potato planted with chives (27.5%) compared to the control plants (41.2%). Moreover, sweet potato grown with chives attracted more beneficial arthropod/ insects.
Conclusion: In conclusion, planting sweet potato with chives has a positive impact on the production with 13% increment of sweet potato yield compared to planting sweet potato alone. Farmer earned extra income from the sale of chives in addition to the existing sweet potato produce. Furthermore, results of the analysis showed that more positive benefits were obtained with the value of in net income RM 344.57 when sweet potato was planted companion with chives.
Sweet potato is a superb source of vitamins, minerals,
anti-oxidants, dietary fiber, protein and calcium. All parts of sweet potato
plants are edible and it is easy to grow. In Malaysia, sweet potato is well
known in food industry as a source of nutritious and healthy diet. According to
the Malaysia crop statistic data in 2019, sweet potato was cultivated highest
in the state of Perak (1,846 ha) followed by Kelantan (596 ha) and Selangor
(267 ha) [1]. Sweet potato feathery mottle virus (SPFMV) and Sweet potato
chlorotic stunt virus (SPCSV) is the most important virus reported affecting
sweet potato crop worldwide. The combination of SPFMV and SPCSV is known as
sweet potato virus disease (SPVD) where in this case, the viruses may help each
other to multiply resulting more severe symptoms of infection in sweet potato.
In Malaysia, the virus attack was first discovered in 2009 [2]. By 2016, an
area of 63 hectares of Vitato cultivation in Tembila and Dendong Kelantan were
attacked by virus of which caused reduction to the farmer’s yield and income.
An average income of farmers decreased from RM30,000 / season to RM10,000 /
season [2]. A wide range of aphid species mainly by winged adults transmits
SPFMV in non-persistent manner. By other means, SPFMV could also be transmitted
through the use of infected cuttings materials [3]. SPCSV is transmitted by the
whitefly especially Bemisia tabaci,
as they fly from plant to plant by feeding up the plant sap to cause many
plants become infected. Whitefly usually is the driving force behind the spread
of SPVD. Once a virus enters a plant cells, it will take over part of the
management of the cell’s processes. These new virus particles will then spread
to adjacent cells, increases the permeability of plasmodesmata to virus particles
resulting accumulation of carbohydrates and decreasing of photosynthesis rate
in the leaves [4]. The common virus symptom in sweet potato is chlorosis of the
leaf tissue either between the leaf veins or along the veins. The leaves could
be misshapen with an uneven or curled appearance. Pigmented leaves, often
purple or yellow spots or rings could also be observed. Moreover, virus
infection will affect the yield quality of sweet potato and reduce its storage
roots production and volume of harvest. It is inevitable that infected sweet
potato multiplied on grower’s farm over several seasons will lead to the
reduction of sweet potato grower’s income. It is really important to control
the pest vector of sweet potato viruses. To mitigate the effect of virus,
farmers normally practice a scheduled spraying of insecticides to control the
vector population. However, the use of agricultural chemicals (insecticide) to
the target plants would eventually affect the whole site including crop plants,
soil organisms, humans and wildlife in that area. As an alternative, much
attention has been focused on eco-friendly methods to control the virus and its
vector. Generally, virus disease could be managed via immunization and
prophylactic measure. Application of repellent companion crop for the
management of pest in prophylactic measure is well documented. Plants with
pesticidal properties possess compounds that have effects to repel pests. The
botanical compounds with pesticidal activity that successfully have been
isolated and commercialized including azadiractin from neem (Azadirachta indica), pyrethrin from pyrethrum (Tanacetum cinerariifolium), garlic (Allium sativum), turmeric (Curcuma
longa), rosemary (Rosmarinus
officinalis), ginger (Zingeber
officinale) and thyme (Thymus
vulgaris) [5]. Allium spp.
volatiles was found able to inhibit attraction of aphid to a host plant [6]. In
this study, the important compounds of chives were determined through chemical
analysis. The efficacy of applying chives as pest repellent crop with sweet
potato was evaluated with the target to reduce the number of pest population
that vectored virus disease in sweet potato cultivation. Moreover, the economic
impact using partial budgeting was calculated for the expected change in profit
of having chives planted companion to sweet potato.
Plot and planting
materials
This study was carried out at farmer’s farm in
Semenyih Selangor in July to November 2020. Virus-free sweet potato (variety
Lembayung) cuttings that collected from MARDI Bachok Kelantan were planted in
polybags contained of coco peat media at hot spot area of farmer’s farm in
Semenyih Selangor. Chives that propagated in a glasshouse at MARDI Serdang were
used as a companion crop in this study. Chives that planted at ratio 1:2
(chives: sweet potato) two weeks prior to sweet potato planting were used as a
treatment in this study meanwhile, sweet potato planted without chives were
used as a control. This experiment was arranged in completely randomized
design.
Leaf gas exchange
parameters
Leaf gas exchange parameters of sweet potato were
measured using a Portable Photosynthesis System (LI-COR 6400, LICOR Inc.,
U.S.A.) at 70 days after planting. Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) of
the leaf chamber was set at 1200 ?mol m-2 s-1. The
chamber temperature was maintained at 30? and the reference CO2
concentration was 400 ppm (?mol mol-1). Relative humidity was
controlled between 50-70% with airflow rate at 500 ?mol s-1. The gas
exchange measurements were done on the mature, unshaded and completely expanded
leaves; between 0800 to 1100 h, which photosynthetic rates would be maximal
[7]. The leaf gas exchange for net photosynthesis rates (A) (?mol m-2
s-1) of virus infected and healthy plants were recorded and
statistically analysed.
Monitoring of pest
vector and beneficial insect in sweet potato cultivation
Monitoring of pest vectors (aphid and whitefly) and
beneficial insect were conducted using scouting, yellow sticky trap (YST) and
sweeping methods for three times throughout the planting season. In each
monitoring; pest vector was monitored using ten random scouting/ treatment,
five YST/treatment and five sweeps / treatment. Scouting was done by direct
counting of the presence of aphid and whitefly on ventral side of five apical
leaves in ten random plants. YST was placed at appropriate boundaries in the
plot and collected after 24h. The arthropod caught on each YST and sweeping
were identified and classified by their Order and Family. Mean number of aphid
and whitefly population in sweet potato planted with chives and control were
evaluated and statistically analysed.
Monitoring of incidence
and identification of virus in sweet potato cultivation
Virus incidence was scored for three times throughout
the planting season. The presence of virus symptoms on sweet potato leaves
grown with chives and without chives were recorded quantitatively. Disease
incidence percentage is calculated following the equation:
Disease incidence percentage = (Symptomatic plant/
whole plant population) X 100
Virus identification process that involve of RNA
extraction and cDNA synthesis was carried out using HiScript II One step RT-PCR
kit (Vazyme) following the manufacturer’s manual. Polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) was performed using specific primers for different viruses. The PCR
products were then cloned and sent for sequencing analysis. A derived DNA
sequence of the main virus was registered in National Center for Biotechnology
Information (NCBI).
Statistical analysis
The data generated from monitoring of pest vector,
beneficial insect and virus incidence were subjected to statistical analysis
using one-way ANOVA without interaction (SAS 9.4). The means significance
differences for pest vector and disease incidence of sweet potato planted with
chives and control were then performed using Duncan’s multiple range tests (the
minimum significance was set at P < 0.05).
Chemical compound
analysis of chives
Chemical compound analysis of chives was carried out
using five grams of powdered sample of chives that mixed with 45 mL methanol at
a ratio of (1:9). The samples were continuously shaken for 7 hours at 250 rpm
and subsequently filtered with a filter paper no 1 (Whatman) into a conical
flask. Two mL methanol extract of chives was then transferred into a GC vial
and injected into a GC-MS. The GC-MS instrumentations consisted of a gas
chromatograph mass spectrometer (GC/MS) analysis performed on an Agilent 7890A
gas chromatograph (GC) directly coupled to the mass spectrometer system (MS) of
an Agilent 5975C inert MSD with triple-axis detector. The column used was
DB-5MS UI (Agilent Technologies) with 30m length, 0.25 mm diameter with a
stationary phase of 5% phenyl methylpolysiloxane, 0.25 ?m film thickness. An
identification of peaks were done by a MSD Chemstation to find all of the peaks
in a raw GC chromatogram. A library search was carried out for all the peaks
using the NIST/EPA/NIH version 2.0. Selective compounds for sulphide components
as active compounds were determined.
Partial budget analysis
This study had employed partial budget analysis
towards chives planting for controlling virus transmission in sweet potato
cultivation. Partial budgeting is a consistent method for calculating the
expected change in profit from a proposed change in the farm business without
determining the absolute profit. The essentials parameter that taken into
account includes additional cost incurred, lost or reduction of current income,
additional income received and reduction or elimination to the current cost. The
analysis done using this partial budgeting was adapted from [8].
Identification of virus
SPFMV was identified as the major virus infecting sweet potato plants in farmer’s field in Semenyih Selangor. Other than that, SPCSV also was also observed in the farmer’s field with virus incidence less than 5%. Leaves infected by SPFMV showed of purple ringspot (Figure 1-i) and yellow chlorotic (Figure 1-ii). Meanwhile the symptom of SPCSV symptom is observed having purplish stipping between the veins (Figure 1-iii).The major virus presence was confirmed through PCR analysis of which produced a band size approximately 400bp. Analysis of the DNA sequencing product showed a 98.8% similarity to Sweet potato feathery mottle virus in the tested samples.
Figure 1: Symptoms of SPFMV in sweet potato: purple ring spot symptom (i) and yellow chlorotic symptom (ii). Symptom of SPCSV: purplish stippling between the veins (iii).
The DNA sequence of major infecting virus (SPFMV) was registered in NCBI under accession MW255529.Virus infection reduced the number of roots formed as well as the diameter of the roots resulting in a greater length to diameter ratio compared to the non-infected plants. This could be contributed by low photosynthesis rate in the symptomatic leaves of the infected plants. Based on the evaluation in this study, photosynthesis rate was found to be significantly lower in symptomatic leaves of virus infected plants when compared to the healthy (virus free) plants. This finding is supported by the result of who explained cassava root yield losses was determined from viral infection that caused photosynthetic alterations associated with changes in chloroplast ultra-structure and carbohydrate metabolism of cassava plants [9] (Figures 1 and 2).
Figure 2: Mean of photosynthetic rate in healthy sweet potato (virus free) compared to infected sweet potato plant. Means covered by the same letter are not significantly different.
Pest vector and
beneficial insect population in sweet potato cultivation
Aphid and whitefly were observed at all interval of
monitoring. Analysis revealed no significant difference (P>0.5) of mean
number for aphid and whitefly population between sweet potato planted with
chives or control plants. Nevertheless, a lower mean number of aphid (3.67 ±
1.9) and whitefly (74.1 ± 28) in sweet potato planted with chives were observed
when compared to mean number of aphid (7.56 ± 3.1) and whitefly (102.0 ± 34) in
the control plants. It is important to control virus incidence by lowering the
pest vector at low population as aphid could transmit SPFMV in a non-persistent
manner of which means aphid uptake the virus (acquisition) within just a few
seconds on the infected plant and directly transmits the virus to a healthy
plant. On the other hand, whitefly normally has short flight between
neighbouring plants and rarely flying more than 0.5m above the canopy to spread
the virus [10]. Selection of intercropping plant with potential effects on the
target pest is important to ensure the success of eliminating virus
transmission by pest vector. Volatile organic compound from Allium tuberosum was studied as an
alternative to chemicals for pest control [11]. A study found a lower densities
of B. tabaci and/or incidence of
associated viruses when tomato were intercropped with Allium spp [12]. Preliminary screening of a hexane-chives extract
using GC-MS, identified three sulfide tentative compounds as dimethyl
trisulfide (2.974%), S-methyl methanethiosulfinate (2.204%) and S-methyl
methanethiosulphonate (1.744%) in chives.
Similarly, sulfide compound was detected in Allium spp [13] by as an important pest
repellent. Sulfide in chives would make insects to make oriented movements away
from its source. Sulfide in chives may react chemically and physiologically
with the host plant making it unsuitable host for aphids [14]. Moreover, chives
that remain green throughout the year in tropical conditions would continuously
releasing volatile organic compound to provide persistent protection [15]. In
addition, sweet potato grown with chives also attracted significant number of
predators in Order Diptera (Family: Dolichopodidae). Other than that, predator
in Order Araneae (Family: Oxyopidae and Lycosidae) and parasitoid in Order
Hymenoptera (Family: Platygastridae, Eulophidae, Chalcididae, Braconidae) were
also observed higher in sweet potato grown with chives compared to the control.
Virus incidence in sweet
potato cultivation
The virus incidence percentage reported in this study
was based on SPFMV and SPCSV symptoms such as mottle, mosaic, stunted, ring
spot and purplish stippling between the veins of sweet potato leaves. Mean of
the virus incidence shown in Figure is significantly (P < 0.05) lower in
sweet potato planted with chives (27.5%) compared to the control plants (41.2%).
The lower incidence of virus disease in sweet potato planted with chives is
hypothesized correlated with the lower number of aphid and whitefly population
observed in this study. Most importantly, sweet potato planted with chives
produced 13% more yield than the harvest of sweet potato without chives.
Similarly, [12] found a higher yield of tomato when it was intercropped with Allium spp. compared to plots grown with
tomato alone (Figures 3 and 4) (Table 1).
Table 1: Sulphide compounds identified in a crude extract of Allium tuberosum.
Sulphide
Compounds |
GC-MS Library
Matching (%) |
Relative
GC-MS Area (%) |
Trisulfide compound |
||
Dimethyl trisulfide
|
95 |
2.974 |
Thiosulfinate compounds |
||
S-Methyl methanethiosulfinate |
70 |
2.204 |
S-Methyl methanethiosulphonate |
94 |
1.744 |
Figure 3: Mean number of pest vector in sweet potato cultivation (i). Mean number of beneficial insect in sweet potato cultivation (ii). Means covered by the same letter are not significantly different.
Table 2: Partial budget result for companion crops planting in sweet potato cultivation.
Proposed change:
Companion crops planting for controlling virus transmission in sweet potato
cultivation |
|||
Positive effects |
Value |
Negative effects |
Value |
Additional
income: |
|
Reduced income |
|
Purple sweet potato
(13%) |
447.00 |
- |
- |
Companion crop |
377.57 |
|
|
Total additional income |
824.57 |
Total reduced income |
- |
Reduced costs: |
|
Additional
costs: |
|
- |
- |
Companions crop seed (192*RM
2.50/polybag) |
480.00 |
Total reduced costs |
- |
Total additional costs |
480.00 |
Total additional income
and reduced costs (TAIRC) |
RM 824.57 |
Total reduced income
and additional costs (TRIAC) |
RM 480.00 |
Change in net income
(TAIRC-TRIAC) |
RM 344.57 |
Partial budgeting on the
effect of sweet potato planting with chives
Partial budget is suitable approach in assessing changes in the business with associating with the specific change in the farm [16-18]. According to partial budget comprises of four categorical parts of which additional income, reduced costs, reduced income and additional costs. Farmers normally dealt with changes and adjustment in farm management due to maximizing profit, enhancing size or improvement in some technical aspect. The farm price for sweet potato was RM 12 per kilogram when data of the yield was collected in November 2020. Results of the partial budget analysis in Table 2 evaluated that the net impact of planting chives as companion crops for controlling virus transmission in sweet potato cultivation was having positive effect. The total of positive effects was RM 344.57/acres/season. Meanwhile, the negative effects only involved the additional costs of chives at RM 2.50 per polybags for 192 seedlings. Furthermore, findings of this study revealed a positive effect on change in net income resulted from small changes in the farm management.
Figure 4: Mean of incidence percentage of virus disease in sweet potato cultivation. Means covered by the same letter are not significantly different.
An additional income was
contributed by production of sweet potato at RM 447.00 and revenue for chives
as companion crops at RM 377.57. The extra earn by farmer in this study is
supported by who mentioned that profit maximization are drivers for farmers
motivation for the expected profit or expected utility maximization [19] (Table
2).
Planting chives as a companion crop in sweet potato
cultivation showed an effective method to control the virus pest vector. A
reduction of pest vector population in sweet potato planted with chives would
make a significant different reduction of virus incidence. Furthermore, chives
that known to have sulphide active compounds could be planted throughout entire
period for years to benefits farmers generating an additional income. The
findings however would be repeated for more seasons to verify the results in
the near future.
This study was funded by MARDI Development project
(PGB403). Author would like to express her gratitude to all who are directly
and indirectly involved in this study.